Can Humans Run Vertical Loops? The Science Behind Running Feats

  • Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Running
In summary, based on calculations, it is theoretically possible for a human with a top speed of 10m/s, such as Carl Lewis, to complete a vertical loop that is 10m high. However, this is unrealistic and not possible for normal humans due to the amount of energy required and other factors such as friction and the force of gravity. It is also worth considering that running up a wall and flipping back could also be considered as "running a loop" and has been demonstrated by some individuals.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
Theoretically, can a human in 1g circuit completely a vertical loop solely by running?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What's a "1g circuit" ?
 
  • #3
Let's say that top speed for a human is 10m/s. (Faster than me, but Carl Lewis can do it.)

The centripetal acceleration is [tex]\frac{v^2}{r}[/tex]. In order for the runner not to fall from the top of the loop he must be at least in free fall at the top of the loop. So we get
[tex]\frac{100\frac{m^2}{s^2}}{r} > 9.81 \frac{m}{s^2} \rightarrow r < \frac{100}{9.81} m[/tex]

So if the human could maintain top speed all the way up, then it would be possible for someone like Carl Lewis to run a loop that was 10m high.

This is, of course, unrealistic. According to the same calculations, someone who can run 5m/s should be able to run a 3m high loop. (This is not possible -- at least not for normal humans)

There are major factors that the calculation ignores - one is that the amount of energy that goes into going up the loop while maintaining that speed is quite large -- certainly larger than what a human can produce -- that there will be a loss of friction as the runner goes up the loop which increases the problems with energy consumed by climbing , and also that, for a circular loop, the runner would be pulling 2G's while running at the bottom of the loop.

Depending on how you define running a loop, running up a wall, and then flipping back would qualify. This is something that people can certainly do (watch "Singing in the rain" for a spectacular example.) Based on footage like that I would say that at least some humans can run loops.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
NateTG
Depending on how you define running a loop, running up a wall, and then flipping back would qualify. This is something that people can certainly do (watch "Singing in the rain" for a spectacular example).
With wingtips yet. Thanks for your competent delineation.
 

1. What is a "Running feat: loop-de-loop"?

A "Running feat: loop-de-loop" is a stunt or trick performed by a runner where they run in a circular motion, creating a loop-de-loop shape. This is typically done at high speeds and requires a lot of agility and skill.

2. How is a loop-de-loop performed?

To perform a loop-de-loop, the runner must first build up speed and momentum. They then begin to run in a circular motion, gradually tightening the circle until they are able to create a full loop-de-loop shape. This requires precise footwork and balance.

3. What are the physical benefits of performing a loop-de-loop?

Performing a loop-de-loop can improve a runner's agility, balance, and coordination. It also requires a high level of cardiovascular endurance, making it a great exercise for improving overall fitness.

4. Are there any risks involved in performing a loop-de-loop?

Yes, there are risks involved in performing a loop-de-loop. If not executed properly, the runner can fall and potentially injure themselves. It is important to practice and perfect the technique before attempting this stunt.

5. What other running feats are similar to a loop-de-loop?

Other running feats that are similar to a loop-de-loop include the "figure-eight" and the "corkscrew". These stunts also involve running in circular motions and require a high level of skill and coordination.

Similar threads

  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
359
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
54
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
917
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
243
Back
Top