Measures of the intensity of electromagnetic radiation

In summary: It is important to remember that each measure serves a specific purpose and is used in different contexts. As with any scientific concept, it may take some time and practice to fully understand and apply these measures. Keep exploring and learning, and you will surely gain a deeper understanding of the subject. Best of luck!
  • #1
Wox
70
0
I've always struggled with the commonly used measures of the intensity of electromagnetic radiation and it's catching up to me lately. Suppose [itex]\bar{P}(R,\phi,\theta)[/itex] is the Poynting vector of an electromagnetic field (in spherical coordinates) with norm [itex]I(R,\phi,\theta)=\|\bar{P}(R,\phi,\theta)\|[/itex] in [itex]J.m^{-2}.s^{-1}[/itex] (strictly speaking it should be the ensemble average of the norm). Then the flux [itex]\Phi[/itex] through a surface [itex]S[/itex], for which [itex]\Psi[/itex] is the angle between Poynting vector and surface normal at [itex](R,\phi,\theta)[/itex], is given by (in [itex]J.s^{-1}[/itex])
$$\begin{align}\Phi_{S}&=\iint_{S} I(R,\phi,\theta)\cos\Psi\ \text{d}A\\
&=\iint_{S} I(R,\phi,\theta)\cos\Psi\ R^{2}\ \text{d}\Omega\\
&=\iint_{S} I(R,\phi,\theta)\cos\Psi\ R^{2}\sin\theta\ \text{d}\phi\text{d}\theta
\end{align}$$
In radiometry, this is called the radiant flux. From this measure of intensity, several other measures are derived, but I'm a bit puzzled how. Take for example the radiant intensity [itex]I_{e}[/itex]: the power per solid angle (in [itex]J.sr^{-1}.s^{-1}[/itex]). From the equations above I understand that
$$I_{e}=\frac{\text{d}\Phi_{S}}{\text{d}\Omega}=I(R,\phi,\theta)\cos\Psi\ R^{2}$$
but how is this independent from surface [itex]S[/itex] (which is the point of using other measures than the radiant flux)? Secondly, while you're at it, why not using
$$J=\frac{\text{d}^{2}\Phi_{S}}{\text{d}\phi \text{d}\theta}=I(R,\phi,\theta)\cos\Psi\ R^{2}\sin\theta$$
which I also don't see to be independent of [itex]S[/itex], but at least you don't need to remember the [itex]\sin\theta[/itex] when integrating it. Then there are measures like the radiance in [itex]J.m^{-2}.sr^{-1}.s^{-1}[/itex] which is defined as
$$L_{e}=\frac{\text{d}^{2}\Phi_{S}}{\cos\Psi\text{d}A \text{d}\Omega}$$
I can write that down but I can't say I understand what it means. Can anyone shed some light on these issues?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for sharing your struggles with the commonly used measures of intensity of electromagnetic radiation. I can understand the confusion and complications that can arise when dealing with these measures. Allow me to shed some light on the issues you have raised.

Firstly, let's focus on the radiant intensity I_e. As you correctly mentioned, this measure is defined as the power per solid angle and is expressed in units of J.sr^{-1}.s^{-1}. This measure is independent of the surface S because it is a measure of the directional flow of energy from a point source. In other words, it gives us information about the amount of energy that is passing through a unit solid angle in a specific direction. This is why it is also known as the directional radiant flux.

To further understand this, let's consider a simple example. Imagine a point source of light, like a bulb, emitting light in all directions. Now, if we want to measure the intensity of the light in a specific direction, say towards the ceiling, we would use the radiant intensity. This measure tells us how much power is passing through a unit solid angle in that specific direction. It is important to note that this measure is independent of the surface because it only considers the direction of the energy flow, not the surface it is passing through.

Moving on to your second question about the measure J, also known as the radiant exitance. This measure is defined as the radiant flux per unit area and is expressed in units of J.m^{-2}.s^{-1}. This measure is not independent of the surface S because it takes into account the area of the surface that the energy is passing through. In other words, it tells us how much energy is passing through a unit area of a surface in a specific direction. Therefore, this measure is dependent on the surface S.

Finally, let's discuss the radiance L_e, which you mentioned to be the most confusing for you. This measure is defined as the radiant flux per unit area per unit solid angle and is expressed in units of J.m^{-2}.sr^{-1}.s^{-1}. This measure is used to describe the amount of energy emitted or reflected by a surface in a specific direction. It takes into account the area of the surface as well as the solid angle of the energy flow. Therefore, it is dependent on both the surface and the solid angle.

I hope this has helped clarify some of your doubts regarding these
 

Related to Measures of the intensity of electromagnetic radiation

1. What is electromagnetic radiation?

Electromagnetic radiation is a form of energy that is transmitted through a combination of electric and magnetic fields. It includes a wide range of wavelengths, from radio waves to gamma rays.

2. How is the intensity of electromagnetic radiation measured?

The intensity of electromagnetic radiation is measured using a unit called the watt per square meter (W/m²), which represents the amount of energy passing through a given area in one second.

3. What factors can affect the intensity of electromagnetic radiation?

The intensity of electromagnetic radiation can be affected by the distance from the source, the strength of the source, and the medium through which the radiation is traveling (such as air or water).

4. How does the intensity of electromagnetic radiation change with distance?

The intensity of electromagnetic radiation decreases as distance from the source increases. This is because the energy is spread over a larger area, resulting in a lower intensity.

5. What are some common sources of electromagnetic radiation?

Some common sources of electromagnetic radiation include the sun, light bulbs, cell phones, microwaves, and X-ray machines. However, electromagnetic radiation is present in many natural phenomena and human-made technology.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
492
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
311
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
16
Views
632
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
523
Replies
2
Views
618
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
646
Back
Top