Mean value of the nuclear tensor operator

In summary, the mean value of the tensor operator S12 in all directions r can be proved to be zero by using the fact that the integral J (S_{1} , S_{2}) is proportional to the scalar product \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}, and then substituting this into the original equation. This shows that the mean value is equal to the scalar product, which is zero in this case.
  • #1
kvothe18
2
0
Does anyone know how can you prove that the mean value of the tensor operator S12 in all directions r is zero?

S12 : http://prntscr.com/j3gn40

where s1, s2 are the spin operators of two nucleons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is linear in the individual spins. You can split one into an orthogonal and a parallel component (relative to the other). I would expect that it is easy to show based on that.
 
  • #3
kvothe18 said:
Does anyone know how can you prove that the mean value of the tensor operator S12 in all directions r is zero?

S12 : http://prntscr.com/j3gn40

where s1, s2 are the spin operators of two nucleons.
[tex]\langle \frac{3}{r^{2}} ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1}) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) \rangle = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \frac{3}{r^{2}} \ ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} ) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) = \frac{3}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \ ( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1}) ( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) .[/tex] Now, the integral [tex]J (S_{1} , S_{2}) \equiv \int d \Omega \left( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} \right) \left( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} \right) \ ,[/tex] is scalar and linear in [itex]\vec{S}_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{S}_{2}[/itex]. So it must be proportional to the scalar product [itex]\vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}[/itex], i.e., [tex]J (S_{1} , S_{2}) = C \ \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} .[/tex] To find the constant [itex]C[/itex], consider the special case [itex]\vec{S}_{1} = \vec{S}_{2} = \hat{z}[/itex]: [tex]C \ \hat{z} \cdot \hat{z} = J (\hat{z} , \hat{z}) = \int d \Omega \left( \hat{r} \cdot \hat{z}\right)^{2} = \int d \Omega \cos^{2} \theta .[/tex] This gives you [itex]C = \frac{4 \pi}{3}[/itex] and, therefore, [tex]J(S_{1},S_{2}) = \frac{4 \pi}{3} \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3}\langle \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} \rangle . \ \ \ \ (2)[/tex] The last equality follows because [itex]\langle \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} \rangle = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \ \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} = \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}[/itex].

Substituting (2) in the first equation of this post, you find

[tex]\langle \frac{3}{r^{2}} ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} ) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}) \rangle = \langle ( \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) \rangle .[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes nrqed and mfb

Related to Mean value of the nuclear tensor operator

1. What is the nuclear tensor operator?

The nuclear tensor operator is a mathematical operator that describes the relationship between the spin and position of nuclear particles in a nucleus.

2. Why is the mean value of the nuclear tensor operator important?

The mean value of the nuclear tensor operator is important because it provides information about the distribution of spin and position within a nucleus, which is crucial for understanding the properties and behavior of atomic nuclei.

3. How is the mean value of the nuclear tensor operator calculated?

The mean value of the nuclear tensor operator is calculated by taking the expectation value of the operator over all possible quantum states of the nucleus.

4. What is the significance of the mean value of the nuclear tensor operator in nuclear physics?

The mean value of the nuclear tensor operator is significant in nuclear physics as it can be used to study the structure and properties of nuclei, such as their magnetic moments and quadrupole moments.

5. Can the mean value of the nuclear tensor operator be experimentally measured?

Yes, the mean value of the nuclear tensor operator can be experimentally measured through various techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron spin resonance (ESR).

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
451
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top