- #1
Kevin_Axion
- 913
- 2
Last edited by a moderator:
Kevin_Axion said:
rhody said:Background on the technology that created your video.
For instance for ultrasound, this can be replaced with this technology
which analyzes how light scatters volumetric-ally within the human body.
Rhody...
If you observe the light going through the slits, you don't get the interference pattern.feathermoon said:Someone commented on that video:
'They should perform the double slit experiment . . ' with this setup.
It would be neat to see..
Chi Meson said:I read through some of the comments and I learned that photons are luxons, unlike other things made of bradyons, and electrons are made of quarks.
I'm dummer now.
I'm going to buy a Hummer.
Chi Meson said:I read through some of the comments and I learned that photons are luxons, unlike other things made of bradyons, and electrons are made of quarks.
I'm dummer now.
I'm going to buy a Hummer.
Jimmy Snyder said:If you observe the light going through the slits, you don't get the interference pattern.
feathermoon said:It would be neat to see..
I have to admit I never heard of a "bradyon" before, and I thought the poster was corrupting "baryon."rootX said:i'm guessing you don't even know what a luxon is.
If you observe the photons at the slits, you will see a 2:1 ratio and no interference pattern at the screen. If you don't observe the photons at the slits, you will see an interference pattern at the screen and be able to infer a 1:1 ratio from the pattern.LaurieAG said:With just three photons would you expect a 50:50 split or 33:66 or 66:33?
It's a one dimensional recording because all of a second dimension is projected onto the one dimension. I don't see how you could set it up so that only part of that second dimension was projected. What did you have in mind?feathermoon said:Yea, just it being a 1 dimensional recording makes me wonder. Is there an experiment where only part of the slit is looked at? Would there be no interference pattern or a partial pattern? Does constraining a particle to a smaller area completely collapse its wave function or partially collapse it?
Jimmy Snyder said:If you observe the photons at the slits, you will see a 2:1 ratio and no interference pattern at the screen. If you don't observe the photons at the slits, you will see an interference pattern at the screen and be able to infer a 1:1 ratio from the pattern.
What feathermoon suggests is that we observe the photons at the slits and record it. Then observe the photons at the screen and record that. Then photoshop the two recordings together. I think that it would work.
Before and after what? Before the photons reach the slits, nothing interesting happens. If you observe them after they pass the slits, but before they reach the screen you destroy the inteference pattern. The only way I can see to make this work is to film it twice, once at the slit and once at the screen. Then combine the two sequences to make it look like they were one.LaurieAG said:Hi Jimmy,
In the context of the pulse and the strobe setup you would capture both before and after with different pulses and the screen itself would be unnecessary.
Jimmy Snyder said:Edit: I take it back. This would not work. As soon as the photons leave the slit, the interference pattern is already broken. Having once seen the photons past the slit, the interference pattern is ruined and cannot be reassembled somehow at the screen end. In other words, once you see planes departing, some for New York, some for Los Angeles, there is no way to have some of them arrive in St. Louis unless you bend their paths. Once you observe them at the slit, the inteference pattern is already ruined.
Light pulse travels through a water bottle at trillion frames per second due to the principle of refraction, which is the bending of light as it passes through a medium with a different density. As light enters the water bottle, it slows down and bends. This allows for high-speed imaging of the light pulse as it passes through the bottle.
Studying light pulse travelling through a water bottle at trillion frames per second can provide valuable insights into the properties of light and the behavior of materials under extreme conditions. It can also have practical applications in areas such as high-speed photography, medical imaging, and materials research.
The technology used to capture light pulse travelling through a water bottle at trillion frames per second is called compressed ultrafast photography (CUP). This technology relies on a system of lasers, mirrors, and sensors to capture images at an incredibly fast rate, allowing for the visualization of light pulse movements.
The data from the experiment is analyzed and interpreted using advanced algorithms and mathematical models. The images captured by CUP technology are processed and reconstructed to create a video that shows the movement of the light pulse through the water bottle. This data can then be further analyzed to understand the properties of the light and the behavior of the water bottle.
The research on light pulse travelling through a water bottle at trillion frames per second has potential real-world applications in various fields. It can aid in the development of high-speed cameras and imaging systems for use in industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and defense. It can also contribute to advancements in our understanding of light and materials, leading to new technologies and innovations.