- #1
Moridin
- 692
- 3
Peter Unger has argued that every single dollar you do not spend on anything but the absolute essentials of our survival is a dollar that has some starving child's blood on it. What are your opinions on this statement?
Peter Unger is a philosopher and professor at New York University. He is best known for his work in metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.
In his book "Living High and Letting Die", Unger introduces the concept of "blood money" as a way to explore moral responsibility and ethical implications of wealthy individuals who do not donate a significant portion of their wealth to help others in need.
Unger argues that individuals who have a significant amount of wealth have a moral obligation to use it to help others in need, and failing to do so is equivalent to causing harm to those in need. He also suggests that it is not enough to donate a small portion of one's wealth, but rather a significant portion to make a real impact.
Some critics argue that Unger's argument is too extreme and does not take into account the complexities of wealth distribution and individual circumstances. Others argue that his argument is impractical and would lead to negative consequences for both the wealthy and those in need.
Unger's work on blood money has sparked important discussions about moral responsibility and the ethical implications of wealth. It has also prompted individuals to consider their own actions and the impact of their wealth on others. Additionally, it has been a significant contribution to the field of ethics and has influenced other philosophers and academics in their own work.