- #1
Ken G
Gold Member
- 4,897
- 538
I have never heard a challenge by quantum entanglement to the concept that a state is a "property" of a particle, which I don't understand. I cannot see any way someone can interpret a state as a property of a system, rather than as a means of treating information about the system, given how quantum entanglement works. A lot of hay is made about the idea that when one particle in an entangled pair gets measured, the state of the other changes "instantaneously", but I rarely see it questioned that "instantaneous" has no meaning at all when applied to particles that are well separated, and possibly even in quite different reference frames. In particular, if two electrons are entangled to have opposite spins, and one of the spins is measured, how can the other's spin be regarded as a property of that electron when we cannot say when the other electron acquired that new property? Certainly a property must have a unique meaning in the proper time of the particle in question, but here, it simply does not, because there is no unique association of that property with that proper time. How does that not destroy the concept that the spin of an individual electron is a property inherent to that electron?