- #1
Niles
- 1,866
- 0
Hi
I am trying to integrate Newtons equations for my system
[tex]
a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}
[/tex]
This is only for the first coordinate of the particle. I wish to do it for y and z as well, but let us just work with x for now to make it simple.
The force in the x-direction depends on the velocity in the x-direction, vx, and the y- and z-coordinate. In other words
[tex]
F=F(v_x, y, z)
[/tex]
Now, I wish to solve this equation, and I have currently implemented an Euler method. This is how I iterate
[tex]
v_{n+1} = v_n + dt\cdot a(v_{x,n},y_n,z_n) \\
x_{n+1} = x_{n} + dt\cdot v_{n}
[/tex]
I now want to improve the error, and use a 2nd order Runge-Kutta method, i.e. the midpoint rule as briefly summarized here: http://www.efunda.com/math/num_ode/num_ode.cfm
I am not quite sure how to do this. In the link they say that now I should generally write
[tex]
y_{n+1} = y_{n} + dt\cdot f(x_n + dt/2, y_n + k_1/2)
[/tex]
where
[tex]
k_1 = dt\cdot f(x_n, y_n).
[/tex]
This is where my confusion arises: What does [itex]f(x_n + dt/2, y_n + k_1/2)[/itex] correspond to for me?
I would really appreciate a hint or two with this.
Niles.
I am trying to integrate Newtons equations for my system
[tex]
a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}
[/tex]
This is only for the first coordinate of the particle. I wish to do it for y and z as well, but let us just work with x for now to make it simple.
The force in the x-direction depends on the velocity in the x-direction, vx, and the y- and z-coordinate. In other words
[tex]
F=F(v_x, y, z)
[/tex]
Now, I wish to solve this equation, and I have currently implemented an Euler method. This is how I iterate
[tex]
v_{n+1} = v_n + dt\cdot a(v_{x,n},y_n,z_n) \\
x_{n+1} = x_{n} + dt\cdot v_{n}
[/tex]
I now want to improve the error, and use a 2nd order Runge-Kutta method, i.e. the midpoint rule as briefly summarized here: http://www.efunda.com/math/num_ode/num_ode.cfm
I am not quite sure how to do this. In the link they say that now I should generally write
[tex]
y_{n+1} = y_{n} + dt\cdot f(x_n + dt/2, y_n + k_1/2)
[/tex]
where
[tex]
k_1 = dt\cdot f(x_n, y_n).
[/tex]
This is where my confusion arises: What does [itex]f(x_n + dt/2, y_n + k_1/2)[/itex] correspond to for me?
I would really appreciate a hint or two with this.
Niles.