Instability of hydrogen ground state if the time-reversal operator is unitary

In summary, the time-reversal operator ##T## must be anti-unitary in order to avoid instability of the ground state of hydrogen. This is because if ##T## is unitary, it would imply that the energy spectrum has a lower bound, which is not the case for a free particle or an electron in a Coulomb potential. Therefore, the time-reversal operator must be anti-unitary in order to maintain time-reversal symmetry.
  • #1
ergospherical
974
1,278
Apparently if we try to represent the time reversal operator by a unitary operator ##T## satisfying ##U(t)T = TU(-t)##, then the ground state of hydrogen (the hamiltonian of which is time-reversal invariant) is unstable. But if ##T## is anti-unitary (i.e. ##\langle a | T^{\dagger} T | b \rangle = \langle a | b \rangle^*##) then the instability is avoided. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ergospherical said:
Apparently
According to ...?
 
  • #3
I guess ##U(t)=\exp(-\mathrm{i} H t)## is the time-evolution operator (for the states in the Schrödinger picture). If you want to have
$$U(-t)=\exp(\mathrm{i} t H) = T^{\dagger} U(t) T = \exp[T^{\dagger} (-\mathrm{i} t H) \hat{T}],$$
you must have
$$T^{\dagger} (-\mathrm{i} t H) \hat{T}=+\mathrm{i} t H.$$
Since ##t \in \mathbb{R}## for both ##T## unitary or antiunitary that implies
$$T^{\dagger} i H T=-\mathrm{i} H.$$
If ##T## where unitary, that would imply that ##T^{\dagger} H T=-H##, which implies that for any eigenvalue ##E## of ##H## also ##-E## must be an eigenvector:
$$H T |E \rangle=T T^{\dagger} H T |E \rangle=-T H |E \rangle=-E T |E \rangle,$$
i.e., indeed ##T|E \rangle## is an eigenvector of eigenvalue ##(-E)##. Since now the energy spectrum for a free particle (or that of an electron in presence of a Coulomb potential) has a lower bound, ##T## cannot be a symmetry operator if realized as a unitary operator, which implies that time-reversal symmetry must be realized by an anti-unitary symmetry operator.
 
  • Like
Likes strangerep, ergospherical and dextercioby

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
504
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
809
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
967
Replies
3
Views
992
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
850
Back
Top