If we one day harnass nuclear fusion as an energy source

In summary, while common sense dictates that a fusion reactor would also double as a helium balloon factory, there are a few major problems with this idea. First, the helium generators would have to be spread out evenly around the globe in order to prevent the Earth from being pulled out of its orbit, and second, storing and transporting the helium would be difficult and dangerous.

If we one day harnass nuclear fusion as an energy source

  • We should naturally provide for Helium balloon production in every reactor

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • We should only bottle and contain the helium for later use in balloon production

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • We shouldn't use the Helium for any balloon production

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 27.3%

  • Total voters
    11
  • #1
wasteofo2
478
2
Would common sense dictate that along with providing energy, that each fusion reactor would double as a Helium balloon factory, or would I have to take it upon myself to lobby for the creation of such a facility when the time comes?

I would assume that any scientist worth his weight in salt would instantly see the incredible potential that nuclear fusion has to create an unlimited supply of Helium balloons for the whole world, and that any design plan for a fusion reactor would inherently include a balloon factory somewhere therein. However, you really can never tell; the most common sense things are often completely overlooked by the people who are presumably the smartest...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Balloons would be a very dangerous by-product to fusion energy. With the unchecked proliferaiton of balloons, we would live in a world where kids were happy. This must not happen and the UN must take further steps to make sure the unchecked proliferation of balloons is supressed and all kids must live unhappy childhoods due to their history of radical annoyance.
 
  • #3
There's a major problem to be considered in all this. These helium generators will have to be spread out more or less evenly over the globe to prevent the pull of all this new helium from pulling the Earth out of its orbit.
 
  • #4
zoobyshoe said:
There's a major problem to be considered in all this. These helium generators will have to be spread out more or less evenly over the globe to prevent the pull of all this new helium from pulling the Earth out of its orbit.
Certainly if there were a larger number of fusion reactors in one part of the world, the helium would work towards pulling the Earth out of orbit from that point, but all the helium there would just displace the pre-existing heavier atmospheric elements towards the other side of the world, providing an effective counterweight.
 
  • #5
I had to go with the bottling and storing option. Obviously, such a valuable and rare resource must not be wasted. Unfortunately, you would have to store premade balloons as liquid helium balloons (aka very bloody cold water balloons). Even the proper helium-resistant balloon material allows the stuff to outgas at an unacceptable rate. Long term storage isn't practical. Not to mention the transportation problems. Clearly, a truck full of helium balloons won't have enough weight on the road for proper traction. They would have to be shipped by air, but the plane would have trouble landing because they won't want to come down.
 
  • #6
wasteofo2 said:
...all the helium there would just displace the pre-existing heavier atmospheric elements towards the other side of the world, providing an effective counterweight.
Yeah, I didn't think of that - the weight displacing to the other side. Thanks O2!
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Whoops! I just thought of another major problem, this one having to do with health and safety: what if the helium handler's voices get stuck up there, 2 octaves above normal?
 
  • #8
I just thought of another major problem

I was thinking the same thing. How do you think the NRC would react to a frantic phone call from Alvin the Chipmunk, who is claiming that a core meltdown is in progress?
 
  • #9
Ivan Seeking said:
I was thinking the same thing. How do you think the NRC would react to a frantic phone call from Alvin the Chipmunk, who is claiming that a core meltdown is in progress?
Helium is an inherently amusing gas. Hydrogen: now that's a hard gas to laugh at. Strangely, though, hydrogen is more uplifting. It has more lift than helium. It rises so much faster that compared to hydrogen, helium is inert. I'd say it's stuck in second place. Still, it's funnier. Quite a funny gas, helium.
 
  • #10
Perhaps nuclear power plants could be kept aloft with giant blimps filled with Helium. Then we could float all of these blimps over Canada by using long extension cords, just in case something goes terribly wrong.
 
  • #11
Well, I had to vote for bottling the helium since I like both mylar and latex balloons and am worried the factory at the reactor might only specialize in one or the other, thus depriving children of whichever was not produced there.

Though, an option not listed is that I envision a helium tap in every household. Truly, we should strive to have a balloon for every child in every household. I know it sounds like a bit of a socialistic ideal, but since it's an important cause and for children, how could we not all support it? :biggrin:

(Ooh, when I go to Disney with Zz, I want to get a Mickey Mouse balloon too!)
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
Perhaps nuclear power plants could be kept aloft with giant blimps filled with Helium. Then we could float all of these blimps over Canada by using long extension cords, just in case something goes terribly wrong.

I guess you've changed your mind about moving to Canada? :smile:
 
  • #13
Actually, no. But for now the realities of life won't allow it.

Besides, unless they announce it at a hockey game the Canadians will never notice! :biggrin:
 
  • #14
Ivan Seeking said:
unless they announce it at a hockey game the Canadians will never notice! :biggrin:
We would notice, and be grateful, because then all of our lightning would be running down the cords and hitting you guys instead of us. :-p
 

Related to If we one day harnass nuclear fusion as an energy source

1. What is nuclear fusion and how does it work?

Nuclear fusion is a process in which two or more atomic nuclei collide and fuse to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a vast amount of energy in the process. This is the same process that powers the sun and other stars. In order for fusion to occur, extremely high temperatures and pressures are required to overcome the repulsive forces between positively charged nuclei.

2. Why is nuclear fusion considered a potential future energy source?

Nuclear fusion has the potential to provide a virtually limitless supply of clean energy. It produces no greenhouse gas emissions, radioactive waste, or air pollution. Additionally, the fuel source for fusion, hydrogen, is abundant in seawater and can be easily extracted.

3. What challenges are currently preventing us from harnessing nuclear fusion as an energy source?

The main challenge in harnessing nuclear fusion is being able to contain and control the extremely high temperatures and pressures required for the reaction to occur. This requires advanced technology and materials that can withstand extreme conditions. Additionally, the process of fusion also requires a significant amount of energy input in order to initiate and sustain the reaction, which poses a major engineering challenge.

4. How close are we to achieving practical nuclear fusion as an energy source?

While significant progress has been made in understanding and developing fusion technology, there are still many technical and engineering challenges that need to be overcome before it can be considered a practical energy source. Various international projects, such as ITER and the National Ignition Facility, are currently working towards achieving this goal.

5. What are some potential benefits and risks of using nuclear fusion as an energy source?

The potential benefits of nuclear fusion as an energy source include a virtually limitless supply of clean energy, reduced dependence on fossil fuels, and a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. However, there are also potential risks, such as the release of harmful radiation and the potential for accidents or malfunctions in the fusion process. It is crucial that safety measures and protocols are in place to mitigate these risks.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
949
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
765
Replies
15
Views
3K
Back
Top