How to Prove the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes?

In summary, the proof for 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ... + n^{3} = (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n)^{2} using induction involves using the inductive hypothesis and manipulating the equations to prove that the equation holds for n = k+1, assuming it is true for n = k. The key is to use the formula for the sum of the first k terms and add the (k+1)th term to both sides to arrive at the desired result.
  • #1
courtrigrad
1,236
2
Prove that [tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ... + n^{3} = (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n)^{2} [/tex]. So for [tex] n =1 [/tex] [tex] 1^{3} = 1^{2} [/tex]. For [tex] n = k [/tex], [tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ...+ k^{3} = (1+2+3+...+ k )^{2} [/tex]. For [tex] n = k+1 [/tex],[tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} +...+ k^{3} + (k+1)^{3} = (1+2+3+..+ (k+1))^{2} [/tex]. So do I then do this:

[tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ... + k^{3} + (k+1)^{3} = (1+2+3+...+ k)^{2} + (k+1)^{3} [/tex] to show that it is equal to [tex] n = k+1 [/tex]?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
courtrigrad said:
Prove that [tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ... + n^{3} = (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n)^{2} [/tex]. So for [tex] n =1 [/tex] [tex] 1^{3} = 1^{2} [/tex]. For [tex] n = k [/tex], [tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ...+ k^{3} = (1+2+3+...+ k )^{2} [/tex]. For [tex] n = k+1 [/tex],[tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} +...+ k^{3} + (k+1)^{3} = (1+2+3+..+ (k+1))^{2} [/tex]. So do I then do this:

[tex] 1^{3} + 2^{3} + 3^{3} + ... + k^{3} + (k+1)^{3} = (1+2+3+...+ k)^{2} + (k+1)^{3} [/tex] to show that it is equal to [tex] n = k+1 [/tex]?

Thanks
You must use your induction hypothesis, i.e:
[tex]1 ^ 3 + 2 ^ 3 + ... + k ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k) ^ 2[/tex] (1)
To prove that:
[tex]1 ^ 3 + 2 ^ 3 + ... + k ^ 3 + (k + 1) ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k + (k + 1)) ^ 2[/tex]. (2)
i.e if the equation is true for n = k, it also holds when n = k + 1.
------------------
So let's go from what we have:
[tex]1 ^ 3 + 2 ^ 3 + ... + k ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k) ^ 2[/tex]
the LHS of the equation (2) has an extra term (k + 1)3. So let's add (k + 1)3 to both sides of the above equation:
[tex]\Leftrightarrow 1 ^ 3 + 2 ^ 3 + ... + k ^ 3 + (k + 1) ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k) ^ 2 + (k + 1) ^ 3[/tex] (3)
You have to prove that
[tex]1 ^ 3 + 2 ^ 3 + ... + k ^ 3 + (k + 1) ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k + (k + 1)) ^ 2[/tex], right?
Or in other words, you have to prove:
[tex](1 + 2 + ... + k) ^ 2 + (k + 1) ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k + (k + 1)) ^ 2[/tex]
Can you go from here? :)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
yes. thank you
 
  • #4
Hint, an easy way to do it is to use [tex]1 + 2 + ... + k = \frac{1}{2}k(k+1)[/tex]
 
  • #5
Curious3141 said:
Hint, an easy way to do it is to use [tex]1 + 2 + ... + k = \frac{1}{2}k(k+1)[/tex]

Indeed , and [tex]1^3 + 2^3 + ... + k^3 = (\frac{1}{2}k(k+1))^2[/tex]

But that is what the question is asking us to prove, by induction.
So the direct formulae are not applicable (only the assumed tautology can be used) and VietDao's method is the probably the only straightforward method to do this problem .

Arun
 
  • #6
How can you show that [tex] (-1)^{k+1} (1+2+...+k)k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = (-1)^{k+2}(1+2+...+ k + (k+1)) [/tex]?
 
  • #7
You can sum 1+2+3+...+r so why don't you? You can also divide everything by (-1)^{k+1} to remove any doubts about signs. Of course it looks false: the LHS is (the same as) a poly in k^3 and the RHS in k^2
 
Last edited:
  • #8
The original problem was: Prove that [tex] 1-4+9-16 + ... + (-1)^{n+1} n^{2} = (-1)^{n+1} (1+2+... + n) [/tex]. For [tex] n =1 [/tex] [tex] 1 =1 [/tex]. For [tex] n = k [/tex], [tex] 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1} k^{2} = (-1)^{k+1} ( 1+2+...+n) [/tex]. For [tex] n = k+1 [/tex], [tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = (-1)^{k+2}(1+2+...+k+(k+1)) [/tex]. So I want to show that: [tex] 1-4+9-16+...+ (-1)^{k+1}k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = (-1)^{k+1}(1+2+...+k)+(-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} [/tex] or [tex] (-1)^{k+1}(1+2+...+k)k^{2}+(-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = (-1)^{k+2}(1+2+...+ k + (k+1)) [/tex]. When I divide through I get: [tex] (1+2+...+k)k^{2} - (k+1)^{2} = - (1+2+...+k+(k+1)) [/tex] or [tex] \frac{1}{2}k(k+1)k^{2} - (k+1)^{2} = -(\frac{1}{2}(k+1)(k+2)) [/tex]

Isn't this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
arunbg said:
Indeed , and [tex]1^3 + 2^3 + ... + k^3 = (\frac{1}{2}k(k+1))^2[/tex]

But that is what the question is asking us to prove, by induction.
So the direct formulae are not applicable (only the assumed tautology can be used) and VietDao's method is the probably the only straightforward method to do this problem .

Arun

The question is asking one to prove [tex](1 + 2 + ... + k)^2 = 1^3 + 2^3 + ... + k^3[/tex] not that [tex]1 + 2 + ... + k = \frac{1}{2}k(k+1)[/tex]. It's a pretty safe bet that the latter result can be assumed, if not, proof of that by AP sum or induction is trivial.

And, in fact, VietDao hadn't given an explicit method to prove what needs to be proved viz. [tex](1 + 2 + ... + k) ^ 2 + (k + 1) ^ 3 = (1 + 2 + ... + k + (k + 1)) ^ 2[/tex] He merely stated it at something that needs to be proved, how is up to the individual. I'm merely suggesting a valid way to go about proving that proposition.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Something is wrong in your algebra, and general presentation.

You *cannot* write the thing you wish to prove as if it is true:

[tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = (-1)^{k+2}(1+2+...+k+(k+1)) [/tex]

should under no circumstances be the first thing you write down.

I have no idea how you came to the last line from the one immediately preceding it.

Start with:
[tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = \ldots[/tex]and put in something that the inductive hypothesis allows you to do (which is the only valid thing you can do, by the way), namely sum the first k terms using the formula you are assuming and then add the last term on, now rearrange and the answer drops out.
 
  • #11
So [tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1}k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2}[/tex]
 
  • #12
courtrigrad said:
So [tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1}k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2}[/tex]

Right. Now apply the inductive hypothesis.
 
  • #13
[tex] 1-4+9-16 + ...+ (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2} = 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1}k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2}= 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1} k^{2} = (-1)^{k+1}( 1+2+...+n)+(-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Don't mix up the n with the k (n has no place in the expressions).

There's still something wrong with the algebra. You seem to have dropped a term here :


[tex]1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1}k^{2} + (-1)^{k+2}(k+1)^{2}= 1-4+9-16+...+(-1)^{k+1} k^{2}[/tex]

Anyway, how would you proceed?
 
  • #15
got it. thanks
 

Related to How to Prove the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes?

1. What is the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes?

The Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes is a mathematical proof technique used to show that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It states that if we can prove the statement for a base case (usually n = 1), and then show that if the statement is true for any arbitrary number k, it follows that the statement is also true for k+1, then the statement is true for all natural numbers.

2. Why is the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes important?

The Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes is important because it allows us to prove statements about natural numbers without having to explicitly check every single case. It is a powerful tool in mathematics and is frequently used in various fields such as number theory, combinatorics, and algebra.

3. How do you prove the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes?

To prove the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes, we first need to show that the statement is true for the base case (usually n = 1). Then, we assume that the statement is true for an arbitrary number k. Using this assumption, we then show that the statement is also true for k+1. This completes the proof by induction and shows that the statement is true for all natural numbers.

4. Can the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes be used to prove other statements?

Yes, the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes can be used to prove other statements that follow a similar pattern. It can be applied to prove statements about sums, products, inequalities, and more. However, it is important to note that the statement must follow the correct structure for the induction rule to be applicable.

5. What are some common mistakes when using the Induction Rule for Sum of Cubes?

One common mistake is to assume that the statement is true for the base case without actually proving it. Another mistake is to use circular reasoning, where the statement being proved is used to prove itself. It is also important to make sure that the statement is true for all natural numbers, not just a specific subset. Finally, it is important to clearly state the base case and the inductive step in the proof.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
552
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
538
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
969
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
514
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
955
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
711
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top