How to find the time for a ball with (v_i=/=0) to drop?

In summary: Actually, no. I'm pretty sure that's not how it works.In summary, when a ball is spiked from a height of 2.30 m with an initial speed of 20.0 m/s at an angle of 18.00°, it would have landed 5.717 m further on the opposite floor if the downward angle were 8.00°.
  • #1
Eclair_de_XII
1,083
91

Homework Statement


"In a jump spike, a volleyball player slams the ball from overhead and toward the opposite floor. Controlling the angle of the spike is difficult. Suppose a ball is spiked from a height of 2.30 m with an initial speed of 20.0 m/s at a downward angle of 18.00°. How much farther on the opposite floor would it have landed if the downward angle were, instead, 8.00°?"

##y_0=2.3m##
##y=0m##
##x_0=0m##
##v_0=20\frac{m}{s}##
##θ=18°##

Homework Equations


##x-x_0=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2##

##\vec s_0=(2.3m)j##
##\vec s=(s_x)i+(0m)j##
##\vec v_0=(19.02\frac{m}{s})i+(-6.18\frac{m}{s})j##
##\vec a=(9.8\frac{m}{s^2})j##

The Attempt at a Solution


So I've basically separated each of the positions, the initial velocity, and acceleration into four vectors. Since horizontal motion does not at all, affect vertical motion, I think I can use the usual SUVAT formulas to find the time and the distance ##s_x## using vectors. Since a ball with an initial vertical velocity of ##-6.18\frac{m}{s}## but no horizontal motion would have the same final velocity as a ball with the same vertical velocity plus horizontal motion. Yet, when I plug the numbers in, I don't quite get a sensible answer. Using the equations for only the y-parts of the factors involved...

##0m-2.3m=(-6.18\frac{m}{s})t+\frac{1}{2}(9.8\frac{m}{s^2})t^2##
##-2.3m=(-6.18\frac{m}{s})t+(4.9\frac{m}{s^2})t^2##
##4.9t^2-6.18t+2.3=0##

When I use the quadratic equation, it doesn't work out. The only way it could work out is if acceleration were negative, which I doubt.

##t=\frac{6.18±\sqrt{38.2-45.08}}{2(4.9}##

So yeah; imaginary numbers and all that. Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks like you have the wrong sign on your velocity...or your gravity...they should be going in the same direction, right?
 
  • #3
Oh, of course; that makes sense.

But if acceleration is negative, then doesn't that mean that the speed is decreasing? It's increasing, which is why I wrote acceleration as positive.
 
  • #4
##-4.9t_1^2-6.18t_1+2.3=0##
##t_1^2+1.26t_1-0.47=0##
##t_1=\frac{-1.26±1.86}{2}=0.3s##
##x_1=(20\frac{m}{s})(cos(-18°))(0.3s)=5.717m##

##-4.9t_2^2-2.78t_2+2.3=0##
##t_2^2+0.57t_2-0.47=0##
##t_1=\frac{-0.57±1.48}{2}=0.458s##
##x_2=(20\frac{m}{s})(cos(-8°))(0.458s)=9.064m##

##Δx=9.064m-5.717m=3.347m##

I still don't understand why acceleration would also be negative if the ball is gaining in speed.
 
  • #5
The velocity is increasingly negative. That happens when you have a negative velocity and a negative acceleration.
If the signs of v and a are the same, speed is increasing. If they are different, then speed will decrease.
 
  • #6
RUber said:
If the signs of v and a are the same, speed is increasing. If they are different, then speed will decrease.

That is a very useful thing to know. I must be sure to write it down somewhere.
 
  • #7
That's easy to write down: $$\vec a = {d\vec v\over dt} $$ or, in case calculus is still ahead of you :$$\vec a = \lim_{\Delta t\downarrow 0} {\Delta \vec v\over \Delta t} $$
 
  • #8
Yeah, I guess the negative sign would carry over after differentiation, since t isn't to a negative power.

I'm in Calculus II right now, by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #9
Hold on a sec; what if the ball is decelerating, and the velocity is positive and the acceleration is negative? How would the latter be a derivative of the former if they haven't got the same signs?
 
  • #10
Eclair_de_XII said:
Hold on a sec; what if the ball is decelerating, and the velocity is positive and the acceleration is negative? How would the latter be a derivative of the former if they haven't got the same signs?
Since when does the derivative of a function have to be the same sign as the original function?

Draw a plot of velocity versus time, where the velocity starts out at a relatively high positive number and then decreases as time increases. Draw a tangent to the velocity curve where it is decreasing but all of its values are positive. What does the slope of the tangent line represent? Is the slope positive or negative?
 
  • #11
SteamKing said:
Draw a plot of velocity versus time, where the velocity starts out at a relatively high positive number and then decreases as time increases. Draw a tangent to the velocity curve where it is decreasing but all of its values are positive. What does the slope of the tangent line represent? Is the slope positive or negative?

Oh, of course; how silly of me. I already knew this, but didn't really apply it. The slope of the tangent line represents the derivative of the function, and just because the original function is greater than zero, doesn't mean it's not decreasing. Which is to say, it doesn't mean that the derivative is positive. I can't help but think, though, that at some time intervals, acceleration is negative, while at other intervals, it's positive. Like when you throw a ball into the air. Its acceleration is negative, then zero at maximum height, then positive when it comes down. So the question I'm asking, is how would you determine, for a certain movement, whether acceleration is positive or negative, if it changes sign in the midst of its action? I'm going to guess that in that ball example, I'd need to separate it into two separate equations?
 
  • #12
Eclair_de_XII said:
So the question I'm asking, is how would you determine, for a certain movement, whether acceleration is positive or negative, if it changes sign in the midst of its action? I'm going to guess that in that ball example, I'd need to separate it into two separate equations?
This is why applying formulas to physics problems blindly is a bad idea. You should think about the physical processes which are occurring before you dig into your bag of formulas and other mathematical tools.

To answer this particular question about tossing the ball, yes, it's better to analyze the ball going up separately from the case of the ball coming down.
 
  • #13
Eclair_de_XII said:
Like when you throw a ball into the air. Its acceleration is negative, then zero at maximum height, then positive when it comes down. So the question I'm asking, is how would you determine, for a certain movement, whether acceleration is positive or negative, if it changes sign in the midst of its action? I'm going to guess that in that ball example, I'd need to separate it into two separate equations?
Don't confuse acceleration and velocity. For problems like tossing a ball, you have a positive initial velocity subject to a constant negative acceleration from gravity.
At the top of the path, the ball has lost all of its initial velocity. The same negative acceleration is still working on the ball and causes it to start moving in the negative direction.
##v(t)=v(0)+at##
 

Related to How to find the time for a ball with (v_i=/=0) to drop?

1. How do you calculate the time it takes for a ball with initial velocity to drop?

The time it takes for a ball with initial velocity to drop can be calculated using the formula t = (2v_i)/g, where v_i is the initial velocity and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2). This formula assumes that the ball is dropped from a height where there is no air resistance.

2. Does the mass of the ball affect the time it takes to drop?

No, the mass of the ball does not affect the time it takes to drop. This is because the formula for calculating the time does not include the mass of the object. Only the initial velocity and acceleration due to gravity are taken into account.

3. How does air resistance affect the time it takes for a ball to drop?

Air resistance can affect the time it takes for a ball to drop. As the ball falls, it will experience a force of air resistance that increases with its speed. This force will eventually balance out with the force of gravity, resulting in a constant velocity. This means that the ball will take longer to reach the ground compared to a situation with no air resistance.

4. Can the angle at which the ball is dropped affect the time it takes to drop?

Yes, the angle at which the ball is dropped can affect the time it takes to drop. If the ball is dropped at an angle, it will have a horizontal component of velocity in addition to its vertical component. This means that it will take longer for the ball to reach the ground compared to a ball dropped straight down, as it will have to travel a longer horizontal distance before hitting the ground.

5. How can we measure the time it takes for a ball with initial velocity to drop?

There are several ways to measure the time it takes for a ball with initial velocity to drop. One method is to use a stopwatch to time how long it takes for the ball to hit the ground. Another method is to use a motion sensor to track the motion of the ball and record the time when it reaches the ground. Alternatively, you could use video analysis software to analyze a video of the ball dropping and measure the time it takes to reach the ground.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
739
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
60
Views
348
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
248
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top