How Do I Properly Convert a Triple Integral to Cylindrical Coordinates?

In summary, the conversation discusses the proper Latex code for the terminals on a multiple integral and calculating the volume enclosed by x^2+y^2+z^2 = 2 and z = x^2+y^2 using a change to cylindrical coordinates. The correct integral is V = \iiint_{0}^{2\pi}_{0}^{\sqrt{2}}_{\rho^2}^{\sqrt{2-\rho^2}} \rho dz\,d\rho\,d\phi, but the answer obtained does not agree with the expected answer.
  • #1
MaximumTaco
45
0
Firstly, can someone please demonstrate the proper Latex code for the terminals on a multiple integral? Thanks!

Anyway, as you can probably see, I'm calculating the volume enclosed by x^2+y^2+z^2 = 2 and z = x^2+y^2 using a change to cylindrical coordinates.

[tex]

V = \iiint_{0}^{2\pi}_{0}^{\sqrt{2}}_{\rho^2}^{\sqrt{2-\rho^2}} \rho dz\,d\rho\,d\phi

[/tex]

Is that integral right?

The answer i get when evaluating the integral is (pi/3)(4sqrt(2) - 6), which is the same doing it by hand or using Mathematica. But it doesn't agree with the expected answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex] V=\int_{0}^{1}\rho \ d\rho \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\varphi \int_{0}^{\rho^{2}} dz [/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #3



To properly convert a triple integral to cylindrical coordinates, follow these steps:

1. Identify the limits of integration for each variable in the Cartesian coordinates. In this case, the limits are x = 0 to x = sqrt(2), y = 0 to y = sqrt(2), and z = 0 to z = x^2 + y^2.

2. Convert the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates using the equations x = \rho \cos{\phi}, y = \rho \sin{\phi}, and z = z.

3. Substitute the converted limits into the integral. The integral should now be in terms of \rho, \phi, and z.

4. Change the order of integration if necessary. In this case, since the limits for z depend on \rho and \phi, it is best to integrate with respect to z first.

5. Evaluate the integral by integrating with respect to z, then \rho, and finally \phi.

The integral you have written in LaTeX looks correct. However, the answer you obtained may not be the expected answer due to errors in the evaluation or a typo in the original problem. It is always a good idea to double check your work and use a calculator or computer program to verify your answer.
 

Related to How Do I Properly Convert a Triple Integral to Cylindrical Coordinates?

1. What is a triple integral?

A triple integral is a mathematical tool used in multivariable calculus to calculate the volume of a three-dimensional region in space. It involves integrating a function over a three-dimensional region, with each integral representing a different variable.

2. How is a quick triple integral different from a regular triple integral?

A quick triple integral is a simplified version of a regular triple integral that uses a shortcut to calculate the volume of a region. It involves breaking up the region into smaller, simpler shapes, and then using basic geometry to find the volume of each shape. These volumes are then added together to find the total volume of the region.

3. When should I use a quick triple integral?

A quick triple integral is best used when the region in question has a simple shape, such as a rectangular box or a cylinder. It is also useful when the function being integrated is relatively easy to work with and can be integrated quickly.

4. What are the advantages of using a quick triple integral?

Using a quick triple integral can save time and effort compared to a regular triple integral, especially when dealing with simple regions and functions. It also provides a simpler and more intuitive approach to calculating volume, making it easier to understand and apply.

5. Are there any limitations to using a quick triple integral?

While a quick triple integral is useful in certain situations, it may not be suitable for more complex regions or functions. It also does not provide as much insight into the underlying mathematical concepts as a regular triple integral. Additionally, it may not be applicable in other areas of science, such as physics, where more precise calculations are required.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
450
  • Calculus
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
821
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
952
Replies
1
Views
218
  • Calculus
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top