Government detects nonlocality via voting

In summary, the thread was closed for Moderation because it does not seem to qualify as a reasonable discussion.
  • #1
jk22
729
24
Suppose a system which looks at votation of each citizen, answers being yes/no coded as 1,-1. Since a lot of people vote it gives an average value that is encoded as an angle ##\theta##, the score 50/50 corresponding then to ##\pi/2## since the average with 1,-1 were 0.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_correlation

Then one has the functions ##A(n),B(n)## and hence if the covariance ##cov(\theta)=\sum_nA(n)B(n)## is bigger than the linear one after a big number of votation, like Bell's theorem seems to indicate, then this would mean that A and B were entangled.

What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds like numerology to me.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #3
Right, the angle depends on n, so it should be made by a computer, storing the product of vote n in a table divinding theta.
 
  • #4
jk22 said:
What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?

Hypothetically, if there were some quantum "signal" of interest coming from a person that you could measure, and there was a provable unexpected correlation between person A's quantum "signal" and person B's, that correlation could still be due to a shared correlation with an environmental condition.
 
  • Like
Likes jk22
  • #5
Yes that's exactly that, the angles ##\theta_n## are given by the whole social environnement, and in fact it is not a sum but an average of the A and B results over past choices while the angle is given by the whole population at each votation.
 
  • #6
Thread is closed for Moderation...
 
  • #7
After a long Mentor discussion, the thread will remain closed. It appears to be misplaced in the SciFi forum to try to skirt the PF rules for valid sources and reasonable discussions, and does not qualify to be moved to one of the technical forums.
 

Related to Government detects nonlocality via voting

1. What is nonlocality in the context of government voting?

Nonlocality refers to the phenomenon where particles or systems can have instantaneous interactions regardless of the distance between them. In the context of government voting, it means that the decisions made by individuals in one location can have an immediate impact on individuals in another location.

2. How can nonlocality be detected through voting?

Nonlocality can be detected through voting by analyzing the patterns and correlations between votes in different locations. If there is a high level of correlation between votes in distant locations, it suggests that nonlocal interactions may be at play.

3. Why is it important for the government to detect nonlocality in voting?

It is important for the government to detect nonlocality in voting because it can have significant implications for the fairness and accuracy of the voting process. If nonlocal interactions are present, it could potentially lead to biased or manipulated election results.

4. What are some potential challenges in detecting nonlocality via voting?

One potential challenge in detecting nonlocality via voting is the need for large amounts of data and advanced statistical analysis techniques. Additionally, there may be other factors that can influence voting patterns, making it difficult to isolate the effects of nonlocal interactions.

5. How can the government use the knowledge of nonlocality in voting to improve the election process?

By understanding and detecting nonlocality in voting, the government can implement measures to prevent potential manipulation or bias in the election process. This could include implementing stricter security measures or using advanced technologies to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the voting process.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
7
Replies
226
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
839
Replies
4
Views
715
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • General Math
4
Replies
125
Views
17K
Back
Top