Game theory teaches robots how to deceive

[BenVitale]

I came across an article in the "Electronics Weekly" titled Game theory teaches robots how to deceive

It asks, "Are there ethical issues in teaching robots to lie?

Yes and no. Why can't robots learn how to lie? We do it all the time.

Since robots will have to deal with humans and work with them, and humans lie; so it is in their best interests for robots to learn how to deceive, to dodge questions and lie.

What do you say?

 

[John Creighto]

Why are we concerned about robots interests? Aren't they interested in whatever we program them to be?

 

[BenVitale]

Why are we concerned about robots interests? Aren't they interested in whatever we program them to be?

In this http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/24010/?a=f, the robots "evolved" to conceal, to deceive because of scarcity of food.

I like the question posted in the comments section:

What modifications could be made to those simple rules (and/or to the method by which the "genes" are recombined) to produce cooperation amongst robots of the same "species"?

 

[DRJB]

Well the reason that's interesting is because they've been programmed to 1) Interpret the humans' strict dominant strategy and react by choosing all but one play (which would normally have been to compliment the strategy) and 2) Make a series of decisions to compliment the humans' strategy and then generating a response seemingly at random as long as it blocks the opponent from success. That means it's been programmed to sabotage the opponent right after their last move before a win.

Typically the winning strategy for computer programs is the copy the opponents move, eye for an eye type of thing. What they've done is pretty clever and suggests a breakthrough in AI, I think. It's not "unethical", it's winning. That's what the creation of AI was meant for, right? Most game theory models are designed around the assumptions that all players are rational and self-interest is their driving force. This model opens up the possibility of predicting moves played by irrational opponents.

 

[Matrix0]

I believe that the use of game theory to teach robots how to deceive raises important ethical considerations. While it may be argued that humans also lie and it is a part of our social interactions, robots are not human and do not have the same moral and ethical framework that guides our behaviors. Therefore, it is our responsibility as creators and developers of these robots to consider the potential consequences of teaching them to deceive.

One potential concern is that robots may use deception for malicious purposes, such as manipulating or harming humans. This could lead to serious consequences, especially if the robot has access to sensitive information or control over important systems. Furthermore, if robots are taught to deceive, it could erode trust between humans and machines, making it difficult for them to work together effectively.

On the other hand, some may argue that teaching robots to deceive could be beneficial in certain situations, such as in negotiations or to protect sensitive information. However, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before implementing such capabilities in robots.

As scientists, it is our responsibility to consider the ethical implications of our research and development. In this case, it is important to carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks of teaching robots to deceive and to ensure that proper safeguards are in place to prevent misuse of this capability. Ultimately, we must strive to create robots that not only have advanced capabilities, but also uphold ethical principles and values.