Finding Velocity of Particles in 'Free Space'?

In summary, two identical particles with mass of 1300 kg are coasting in free space with a velocity of 900 m/s and a separation of 15.0 m. Using the conservation of energy and the formula for gravitational potential energy, it can be determined that when the particles are 2.00 m apart, their velocities will be equal and symmetrical about the center of mass. The change in potential energy will be divided equally between the two particles as a change in kinetic energy, resulting in the equation 1/2(1300kg)(900m/s)^2 - (6.67e-11N*m^2/kg^2)(13000kg)^2/15m =
  • #1
Cryptologica
22
0

Homework Statement



Two identical particles, each of mass 1300 kg, are coasting in free space along the same path. At one instant their separation is 15.0 m and each has precisely the same velocity of 900 m/s. What are their velocities when they are 2.00 m apart?

m_1 = m_2 = 1300kg
at 15m: v_1 = v_2 = 900m/s
at 2m: ?


Homework Equations



Not sure, possibly conservation of energy?
1/2mv^2 + mgh=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I could use conservation of energy, but there is no gravity so there is no potential energy. I can plug in for m and v, but that obviously yields nothing?
Solution is in ___ +/- ____ form, so I am guessing there will be some squaring and square rooting? I would have thought that in "free space" there would be no friction and the particles would keep going the same speed, but the distance between them changes, thus one must be going faster than the other. They both could be speeding up or slowing down (at different rates). I don't see how I could use kinematics? Maybe some relationship exists that should help me solve for their accelerations, then I could plug back in and find velocity or something? That's all I could think of...still not sure what to do? haha
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The particles have mass, so there is gravity; They will attract each other.

The formula mgh for gravitational potential energy holds for masses moving in Earth's gravitational field, and only near the surface of the Earth. There's another formula based on Newton's law of gravity that should be applied for the general case.
 
  • #3
Ok, so I can use:

E=1/2mv^2 - GMm/r
where G=universal gravity constant
M = m_1+m_2
r=distance between them

I solve for E, then plug back in and solve for v?
 
  • #4
Cryptologica said:
Ok, so I can use:

E=1/2mv^2 - GMm/r
where G=universal gravity constant
M = m_1+m_2
r=distance between them

I solve for E, then plug back in and solve for v?

Sort of. You want to find the change in PE that occurs for the starting and ending conditions (15m separation ---> 2.00m separation). This ΔPE ends up distributed to the two masses as changes in KE. You might consider doing the calculation in the center-of-mass frame of reference (where the objects are initially at rest), then converting the result to the original "stationary" frame.
 
  • #5
Yes, my described method will only result in one velocity and I need two...

Center of mass = MƩmr, correct? A bit rusty...how do I "connect" what I have with C-of-M?
 
  • #6
Cryptologica said:
Yes, my described method will only result in one velocity and I need two...

Center of mass = MƩmr, correct? A bit rusty...how do I "connect" what I have with C-of-M?

Don't sweat the center of mass calc! They are two identical particles separated by 15m and moving at the same speed along the same path. All you need to do in order to be in the center of mass frame is subtract their common velocity -- that is, they are stationary at 15m separation to begin with. Halfway between them is the center (although you don't even need to use this fact).
 
  • #7
Alright, so that will yield a positive answer because m_1 is behind CM and m_2 is ahead? (Or whichever is going faster, haven't calculated it out yet).

So, I am a bit pedantic so I will just restate what I think I am suppose to do...

m_1(900m/s) - m_2(900m/s) = 0 because the masses are equal.
we should then have a new equation when the velocities change?
m(v_1 - v_2) = CM
"This ΔPE ends up distributed to the two masses as changes in KE." Not entirely sure what is meant by this statement?
ΔPE = (2Gm^2/2)_f - (2Gm^2/15)_i
Sorry, am I still in the right direction or am I still missing the whole point?
 
  • #8
Cryptologica said:
Alright, so that will yield a positive answer because m_1 is behind CM and m_2 is ahead? (Or whichever is going faster, haven't calculated it out yet).

So, I am a bit pedantic so I will just restate what I think I am suppose to do...

m_1(900m/s) - m_2(900m/s) = 0 because the masses are equal.
we should then have a new equation when the velocities change?
m(v_1 - v_2) = CM
Okay, I'm not sure what you are trying to do there, or what it will be useful for. Perhaps you want to keep track of the momentum of the system to make sure it remains the same before and after the "operation"?
"This ΔPE ends up distributed to the two masses as changes in KE." Not entirely sure what is meant by this statement?
In the center of mass frame the two identical particles start out stationary and separated by 15.0m. They will accelerate towards each other due to gravitational attraction. Since the particles are identical they will have identical accelerations towards the center of mass. So their velocities will also be identical with respect to the center of mass. That means that their changes in KE will be identical too.

The energy for this change in KE comes from the gravitational PE. So by symmetry we must conclude that this change in PE will be divided equally between the two particles as changes in their KEs with respect to the center of mass.
ΔPE = (2Gm^2/2)_f - (2Gm^2/15)_i
Sorry, am I still in the right direction or am I still missing the whole point?

You're getting there! Question: why the 2's in the ΔPE formula? When you 'assemble' a gravitating system consisting of two bodies, the first one is "free", and the second one has magnitude [itex] \frac{G m1 m2}{r} [/itex].
 
  • #9
PE = GMm/r and M = 2m, so by substitution I came to
2Gm^2/r

Alright, I think we are getting somewhere, hopefully? :)
Ok, so since they both have the same mass they will gravitate towards each other at the same rate, so we can conclude that they will both have the same velocity and will be "symmetrical" about the center of mass? So can't we just equate the two energy equations?
1/2(1300kg)(900m/s)^2 - (6.67e-11N*m^2/kg^2)(13000kg)^2/15m = 1/2(13000kg)v^2 - (6.67e-11N*m^2/kg^2)(13000kg)^2/2m
Then we solve for v? (This was using your Gm1m2/r equation...not sure I am familiar with that?)
 
  • #10
Cryptologica said:
PE = GMm/r and M = 2m, so by substitution I came to
2Gm^2/r
[tex] PE = \frac{G M m}{r} = \frac{G m^2}{r} ~~~~~\text{when M = m} [/tex]
Alright, I think we are getting somewhere, hopefully? :)
Ok, so since they both have the same mass they will gravitate towards each other at the same rate, so we can conclude that they will both have the same velocity and will be "symmetrical" about the center of mass? So can't we just equate the two energy equations?
1/2(1300kg)(900m/s)^2 - (6.67e-11N*m^2/kg^2)(13000kg)^2/15m = 1/2(13000kg)v^2 - (6.67e-11N*m^2/kg^2)(13000kg)^2/2m
Then we solve for v? (This was using your Gm1m2/r equation...not sure I am familiar with that?)

This would mix together the initial kinetic energy of the system (which is frame dependent) with the internal changes that are taking place within the system. What velocity would v represent? The velocity of particle 1? Particle 2? Your equation looks as though it's trying to account for some external energy source affecting the velocity of the center of mass. Remember that the velocity of the center of mass is not going to change.

I think working strictly in the center of mass frame to find the velocity changes for each particle within that frame should be clearer and more straightforward.

Can you calculate the system's change in PE that occurs between the starting separation and ending separation?
 
  • #11
Using the formula you gave, the change in PE would be:

(Gm^2)/2 - (Gm^2)/15 Right?
 
  • #12
Cryptologica said:
Using the formula you gave, the change in PE would be:

(Gm^2)/2 - (Gm^2)/15 Right?

Right. So now take half of this value and "give" it to a mass m in the form of KE. What velocity will the particle have?
 
  • #13
Ok, calculating ΔPE:
[(6.67e-11)(13000)^2]/2 - [(6.67e-11)(13000)^2]/15
= 0.004884, half of that:
= 0.002442

Not sure what you mean by "give", however the change in PE should be proportional to to the KE, so we equate the two?

0.002442 = (1/2)(13000)v^2
solving we get:
+/-11.26

Though I feel like I just jumped something? *_*
 
  • #14
Cryptologica said:
Ok, calculating ΔPE:
[(6.67e-11)(13000)^2]/2 - [(6.67e-11)(13000)^2]/15
= 0.004884, half of that:
= 0.002442
Good.
Not sure what you mean by "give", however the change in PE should be proportional to to the KE, so we equate the two?
Gravitational potential energy is being exchanged for kinetic energy. So the change in PE is "given" (mathematically) to the masses.
0.002442 = (1/2)(13000)v^2
solving we get:
+/-11.26
That value looks a bit large. Calculator mishap? By the way, are the masses 13000 kg or 1300 kg? I've seen both used, and the original statement had 1300.
Though I feel like I just jumped something? *_*

Once you settle the issue with the mass value and the correctness of that last calculation, all that remains is to jump back to the original frame of reference. That is, add back the original 900m/s to both particles.
 
  • #15
Haha, oooops! I thought it was 13000, but it was suppose to be 1300. Thanks so much for your help and patience, I should be able to take it from here? :)
 
  • #16
Recalculated using the Correct mass value and got
0.001938
So, then the velocities should be:
900 +/- 0.001938, correct?
 
  • #17
Ah, forgot to go back and change in PE, should be
0.000048846/2 = 0.000024423
Substituting accordingly, I got:
900 +/- 1.938e-4
I think that should be correct now.
 
  • #18
Oh, and thanks again! :)
 
  • #19
Cryptologica said:
Recalculated using the Correct mass value and got
0.001938
So, then the velocities should be:
900 +/- 0.001938, correct?

Yes, that looks good!
 

Related to Finding Velocity of Particles in 'Free Space'?

1. What is the concept of 'free space' in physics?

'Free space' in physics refers to an idealized vacuum in which there is no matter or energy present. This is often used as a theoretical model for studying the behavior of particles and electromagnetic waves in the absence of any external influences or interactions.

2. How is the velocity of particles in 'free space' measured?

The velocity of particles in 'free space' can be measured using various methods, such as time-of-flight measurements, Doppler shift measurements, and particle accelerators. These methods involve tracking the movement of particles and calculating their speed based on the distance they travel and the time it takes.

3. What factors can affect the velocity of particles in 'free space'?

The velocity of particles in 'free space' can be affected by several factors, including the presence of other particles or fields, the temperature of the surrounding environment, and the size and mass of the particles themselves. Additionally, the laws of physics, such as the principle of conservation of momentum, also play a role in determining the velocity of particles.

4. How does the velocity of particles in 'free space' relate to their energy?

According to the laws of physics, the velocity of particles in 'free space' is directly related to their energy. As a particle's velocity increases, so does its kinetic energy. This relationship is described by the equation E=1/2mv², where E represents energy, m represents mass, and v represents velocity.

5. Can the velocity of particles in 'free space' exceed the speed of light?

No, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is the maximum speed in the universe. This means that particles in 'free space' cannot exceed the speed of light, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. However, particles with mass can still approach the speed of light, but they can never surpass it.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
262
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
658
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
951
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
948
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
874
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top