Field Extensions - Lovett, Theorem 7.1.10 .... ....

In summary: Theorem 7.1.10 in Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications by Stephen Lovett. Lovett defines a polynomial p(x) of least degree such that p(\alpha) = 0 and goes on to prove its irreducibility in F[x]. However, Peter is confused as he believes that if p(\alpha) = 0 then p(x) must have a linear factor x - \alpha in F[x], making it reducible. Euge clarifies that this is not the case as x - \alpha is not a polynomial in F[x] if \alpha is not in F. This condition holds true if and only if \alpha is in F. In summary, Lovett's theorem
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I am reading Abstract Algebra: Structures and Applications" by Stephen Lovett ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 7: Field Extensions ... ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Theorem 7.1.10 ...Theorem 7.1.10, and the start of its proof, reads as follows:
View attachment 6575In the above text from Lovett we read the following ...

" ... ... Let \(\displaystyle p(x)\) be a polynomial of least degree such that \(\displaystyle p( \alpha ) = 0\) ... ... "Then Lovett goes on to prove that \(\displaystyle p(x)\) is irreducible in \(\displaystyle F[x]\) ... ...... BUT ... I am confused by this since it is my understanding that if \(\displaystyle p( \alpha ) = 0\) then \(\displaystyle p(x)\) has a linear factor \(\displaystyle x - \alpha\) in \(\displaystyle F[x]\) and so is not irreducible ... ... ?Can someone please help clarify this issue ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If $\alpha\notin F$, $x - \alpha$ is not a polynomial in $F[x]$, so it cannot be a linear factor of $p(x)$ in $F[x]$. The condition $[F(\alpha):F] > 1$ holds if and only if $\alpha \in F$.
 
  • #3
Euge said:
If $\alpha\notin F$, $x - \alpha$ is not a polynomial in $F[x]$, so it cannot be a linear factor of $p(x)$ in $F[x]$. The condition $[F(\alpha):F] > 1$ holds if and only if $\alpha \in F$.
Thanks for the help, Euge

Peter
 

Related to Field Extensions - Lovett, Theorem 7.1.10 .... ....

1. What is a field extension?

A field extension is a mathematical concept in abstract algebra that involves extending the operations of a base field to include new elements. It is used to create a larger field that contains the original field as a subset.

2. What is the significance of Lovett's Theorem 7.1.10?

Lovett's Theorem 7.1.10 is a fundamental theorem in field extensions that states that every finite extension of a field is algebraic. This means that every element in the extension field can be expressed as a root of a polynomial with coefficients in the base field.

3. How is Theorem 7.1.10 used in mathematics?

This theorem is used in many areas of mathematics, such as algebraic geometry, number theory, and Galois theory. It allows mathematicians to study the properties of field extensions and their elements in a systematic way.

4. What are some examples of field extensions?

Some common examples of field extensions include the field of complex numbers, which extends the field of real numbers, and the field of algebraic numbers, which extends the field of rational numbers. Other examples include finite fields and extensions of the field of polynomials.

5. How does Theorem 7.1.10 relate to the concept of algebraic closure?

Theorem 7.1.10 is closely related to the concept of algebraic closure, which is the smallest field extension that contains all algebraic elements of a given field. The theorem guarantees that this algebraic closure exists for any finite extension of a field, providing a powerful tool in the study of field extensions.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
929
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
901
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top