- #1
pivoxa15
- 2,255
- 1
What is the difference between the two? Does the Newton integral arise from the fundalmental theorem of calculus and the Riemann integral is the Newton integral but more rigorously defined?
The main difference between Newton and Riemann integrals lies in their approach to calculating the area under a curve. Newton's method involves finding the antiderivative of a function and evaluating it at the upper and lower limits of integration. Riemann's method, on the other hand, involves dividing the area under the curve into smaller rectangles and summing their areas to approximate the integral.
Riemann integrals are more commonly used in real-world applications because they can handle a wider range of functions than Newton integrals. Riemann integrals are also easier to calculate and more intuitive to understand, making them a more practical choice for most applications.
Yes, Riemann integrals can be used to calculate improper integrals. Improper integrals are integrals with infinite limits of integration or have a discontinuity within the interval of integration. Riemann's method can handle these cases by breaking up the integral into smaller intervals and summing their areas, leading to an accurate approximation of the integral.
One limitation of Riemann integrals is that they cannot be used to calculate integrals for functions that are not continuous or have discontinuities within the interval of integration. On the other hand, Newton integrals are limited in their applicability to functions that have an antiderivative that can be expressed in terms of elementary functions.
Yes, both Newton and Riemann integrals can be used to solve both definite and indefinite integrals. Definite integrals have specific limits of integration, while indefinite integrals do not. Both methods can handle both types of integrals, although Riemann integrals are more commonly used for definite integrals and Newton integrals for indefinite integrals.