Everytime I start doing math on paper I lose interest

[scout6686]

I then think that I *should*be spending my time in something more "practical" like R or C++ or matlab...then stop the math to code lol

When I do a lot of coding I notice I go to the math and find that I'm able understand it easier because the notation/syntax is so much less busy. Do the majority of mathematicians do math thru machine...? or on paper.

I don't know if anyone else has had this experience..

 

[Vorde]

Well it depends on what you're talking about. Computational Mathematicians (and Applied Mathematicians) often require computer help. Pure Mathematicians (from what I understand) would rarely require the use of computers.

I am amazed however that you find code syntax easier to read than mathematical syntax.

 

[Bacle2]

Have you tried reading any Differential Geometry ? Its notation is famously difficult.

 

[Vorde]

Have you tried reading any Differential Geometry ? Its notation is famously difficult.

I haven't, though on some quick research I would be inclined to agree. I stand behind what I said on a general level though.

 

[Matrix0]

I can understand the struggle of balancing traditional mathematical methods and coding in modern scientific research. While coding certainly has its practical uses, it is important to remember that mathematics is the foundation of all scientific disciplines and cannot be replaced by technology. It is essential to have a strong understanding of mathematical concepts and be able to work through problems on paper in order to fully comprehend and utilize them in coding.

That being said, it is also true that coding can often make complex mathematical calculations more manageable and efficient. It is a valuable tool in modern research and has its own set of advantages. However, it should not be seen as a replacement for traditional mathematical methods, but rather as a complementary tool.

As for the majority of mathematicians, it is difficult to generalize their methods as everyone has their own preferences and approaches. Some may prefer working on paper, while others may find it easier to code. Ultimately, the most important thing is to find a balance between the two and use whichever method is most effective for the task at hand.

In conclusion, while coding may seem more practical and efficient, it is important to not neglect the fundamentals of mathematics and continue to work through problems on paper. Both methods have their own benefits and should be used in conjunction to achieve the best results in scientific research.