- #1
EmilyRuck
- 136
- 6
Hello!
In http://my.ece.ucsb.edu/York/Bobsclass/201C/Handouts/Chap1.pdf, pages 19-20, the Love's Theorem in Electromagnetism is declared. In presence of some electric sources [itex]\mathbf{J}[/itex] and magnetic sources [itex]\mathbf{M}[/itex] enclosed by an arbitrary geometrical surface [itex]S[/itex], which produce outside [itex]S[/itex] a field [itex]\mathbf{E}, \mathbf{H}[/itex] and on [itex]S[/itex] a field [itex]\mathbf{E}_S, \mathbf{H}_S[/itex], it is possible to find another solution to Maxwell's equations with:
My questions are:
Emily
In http://my.ece.ucsb.edu/York/Bobsclass/201C/Handouts/Chap1.pdf, pages 19-20, the Love's Theorem in Electromagnetism is declared. In presence of some electric sources [itex]\mathbf{J}[/itex] and magnetic sources [itex]\mathbf{M}[/itex] enclosed by an arbitrary geometrical surface [itex]S[/itex], which produce outside [itex]S[/itex] a field [itex]\mathbf{E}, \mathbf{H}[/itex] and on [itex]S[/itex] a field [itex]\mathbf{E}_S, \mathbf{H}_S[/itex], it is possible to find another solution to Maxwell's equations with:
- zero sources and zero fields inside [itex]S[/itex];
- the same field [itex]\mathbf{E}, \mathbf{H}[/itex] outside [itex]S[/itex];
- impressed [itex]\mathbf{J}_S = \mathbf{\hat{n}} \times \mathbf{H}_S[/itex] and [itex]\mathbf{M}_S = \mathbf{E}_S \times \mathbf{\hat{n}}[/itex] surface currents on [itex]S[/itex].
- again zero sources and zero fields inside [itex]S[/itex] due to the PEC;
- a field [itex]\mathbf{E}, \mathbf{H}[/itex] outside [itex]S[/itex];
- only impressed [itex]\mathbf{M}_S = \mathbf{E}_S \times \mathbf{\hat{n}}[/itex] surface currents on [itex]S[/itex].
My questions are:
- If the boundary conditions of [itex]\mathbf{E}[/itex] OR to [itex]\mathbf{H}[/itex] are required, why in the first case we need to specify both the surface currents?
- How can the only [itex]\mathbf{M}_S[/itex] currents generate both the fields in the second case?
Emily