Electric field along an electric current

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between electric fields and electric currents, particularly in regards to the direction of the electric field and the concept of equipotential surfaces. The analogy of balls on a hill is used to explain how charges move in an electric field, with the movement of charges against the field being compared to charging a capacitor. The example of a neon tube and a van-degraff generator is also used to demonstrate how the direction and strength of the electric field can affect the flow of current. The conversation ends with a discussion on the nature of equipotential surfaces and their relationship to electric fields and currents.
  • #1
ran13
19
0
Hello fellow PFers,

I'm having some trouble visualizing electric fields along an electric current. Assuming that charge flows from high to low potential, and since electric field lines point from high to low potential, does that mean the electric field is always in the direction of the current? Also, I understand that a wire, if closed, will eventually become equipotential because of the fact that it is closed, but how does that effect the field and current?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It does not.

It's like balls on a hill, a gravitational analogy. If you grab the charge and move it against the field ("uphill") you are "charging" something. After all this is how capacitors get charged.

If you "release" the charge it will want to move with the field possibly releasing energy as it moves (that is, it speeds up and the charge gains kinetic energy from the field).

In a resistor, this is like a rock tumbling down a hill at a steady speed. The rock speeds up as it freefalls but every time it bounces against the hill it slows down a bit heating the spot where it hit the hill.
 
  • #3
I saw a demo that walter lewin did with a neon flash tube and a van-degraff generator.
The Van-degraff creates an E field because charge builds up on it and he holds the neon tube radially away from it and it lights up because the E field causes current to flow because one end is in a stronger E field than the other. But when you rotate it 90 degrees it won't light up cause there is no potential difference everywhere along the tube the E field is the same. Does this help?
 
  • #4
Antiphon said:
It does not.

It's like balls on a hill, a gravitational analogy. If you grab the charge and move it against the field ("uphill") you are "charging" something. After all this is how capacitors get charged.

If you "release" the charge it will want to move with the field possibly releasing energy as it moves (that is, it speeds up and the charge gains kinetic energy from the field).

In a resistor, this is like a rock tumbling down a hill at a steady speed. The rock speeds up as it freefalls but every time it bounces against the hill it slows down a bit heating the spot where it hit the hill.

Sorry, but when you said, 'It does not', which question were you referring to? Regarding your analogy, what would be the counterpart for a charge at the top of the hill, that is, right before it rolls down the hill? Would the resistor be fully charged and equipotential, or is this after the charged gains KE and comes to a steady motion, like with no net force? Thank you for your help :smile:
 
  • #5
cragar said:
I saw a demo that walter lewin did with a neon flash tube and a van-degraff generator.
The Van-degraff creates an E field because charge builds up on it and he holds the neon tube radially away from it and it lights up because the E field causes current to flow because one end is in a stronger E field than the other. But when you rotate it 90 degrees it won't light up cause there is no potential difference everywhere along the tube the E field is the same. Does this help?

I actually saw that, so let me see if I get what you're saying... The E field is uniform on the surface, it's initially radial because it's not interacting with anything (these are ideals but I'm assuming it's okay to assume this for the sake of simplicity?) or maybe doesn't have a definite shape since it isn't interacting with anything. Once a conductor tube is placed near the sphere, the field lines interact/accelerate the electrons in the tube, causing the light?

So when you say that holding the tube parallel to the Van de Graff will not light it up, does that mean the field is actually not radial? Or is it just because an appreciable amount of the field is interacting with particles all along the tube, making it roughly equipotential? Does that mean equipotential surfaces have no net field, and if so, why is that? Do the electric forces acting on the particles somehow cancel? Sorry for the onslaught of questions and thanks for your help.
 
  • #6
If there is an equipotential there will be no current and no e-field.
 

Related to Electric field along an electric current

What is an electric field?

An electric field is a physical phenomenon that exists around an electric charge. It is a force field that describes how a charged particle will be influenced by other charged particles.

How is an electric field created along an electric current?

An electric field is created along an electric current due to the movement of charged particles, such as electrons. As these charged particles move, they create a force field around them.

What is the direction of the electric field along an electric current?

The direction of the electric field along an electric current is perpendicular to the direction of the current flow. This means that the electric field lines are parallel to the wire in which the current is flowing.

How does the strength of the electric field change along an electric current?

The strength of the electric field along an electric current depends on the distance from the current-carrying wire. It decreases as the distance from the wire increases.

How is the strength of the electric field affected by the current intensity?

The strength of the electric field along an electric current is directly proportional to the current intensity. This means that as the current intensity increases, the strength of the electric field also increases.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
603
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
739
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
907
Back
Top