- #1
JohnnyGui
- 796
- 51
I’m probably missing something obvious here but I can’t figure out what.
Consider a galaxy, starting at an initial distance of ##D_0##, recessing with a constant velocity. After a time Δt, we’d measure a larger distance ##D_{t}##. From this scenario I’d conclude that the Hubble value based on this object is calculated by:
$$H = \frac{D_t – D_0}{Δt} \cdot \frac{1}{D_0}$$
That is, the velocity, which is obtained by the first fraction, divided by the initial distance ##D_0## of the galaxy gives the Hubble value when the galaxy was at distance ##D_0##
Now, from what I understand, the scale factor ##a## is how large the reached distance ##D_t## is relative to the initial distance ##D_0##. Thus; ##a = \frac{D_t}{D_0}##
Furthermore, the rate of change of the scale factor ##\dot a## is how much the distance has increased per unit of time, relative to the initial distance ##D_0##. So ##\dot a## could be calculated by adding the velocity (a distance per unit time) to the initial distance ##D_0## and dividing that by ##D_0##:
$$\dot a = (\frac{D_t – D_0}{Δt} + D_0) \cdot \frac{1}{D_0}$$
When combining these formulations for ##H##, ##a## and ##\dot a## I’d get: ##H+1 = \dot a##.
This is obviously not true since it should be ##H = \frac{\dot a}{a}##.
What am I missing?
Consider a galaxy, starting at an initial distance of ##D_0##, recessing with a constant velocity. After a time Δt, we’d measure a larger distance ##D_{t}##. From this scenario I’d conclude that the Hubble value based on this object is calculated by:
$$H = \frac{D_t – D_0}{Δt} \cdot \frac{1}{D_0}$$
That is, the velocity, which is obtained by the first fraction, divided by the initial distance ##D_0## of the galaxy gives the Hubble value when the galaxy was at distance ##D_0##
Now, from what I understand, the scale factor ##a## is how large the reached distance ##D_t## is relative to the initial distance ##D_0##. Thus; ##a = \frac{D_t}{D_0}##
Furthermore, the rate of change of the scale factor ##\dot a## is how much the distance has increased per unit of time, relative to the initial distance ##D_0##. So ##\dot a## could be calculated by adding the velocity (a distance per unit time) to the initial distance ##D_0## and dividing that by ##D_0##:
$$\dot a = (\frac{D_t – D_0}{Δt} + D_0) \cdot \frac{1}{D_0}$$
When combining these formulations for ##H##, ##a## and ##\dot a## I’d get: ##H+1 = \dot a##.
This is obviously not true since it should be ##H = \frac{\dot a}{a}##.
What am I missing?
Last edited: