Dark Energy and EM/G unification.

In summary: However, there are still many unanswered questions and debates surrounding the nature of dark energy and its role in the universe.
  • #1
kenewbie
239
0
What is the consensus out there on Dark Energy? Do we believe it exists or is it just a number that shows us how much our current calculations are off by?

If we were to unify EM and G, would getting rid of Dark Energy be a postulate for such a theory?

One could for example think of EM as being G, but at long ranges we imagine that the electron "disappears" (IE the electron's ability to interact with a proton goes down by E as the distance goes up) and so at large distances we are left with protons pushing each other away (The protons ability to interact with each other goes down with a number P which is lower than E).

Tweak the numbers so to speak and you can build a system which explains expansion while still being operational as it is today on a planet. It might even be possible to tune the numbers to show that the attraction of gravity in a "small system" like the Earth is simply a result of the uneven E/P strengths.

Has there been any calculations done which goes down this path? Without going into the actual math itself (which would be way above me), I'm wondering if the numbers pan out, and If they do, what are the arguments against such a view of the universe?

k
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The consensus is that dark energy does exist, and the evidence for it is strong. Scientists believe that dark energy is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe, and this is supported by a variety of observations such as the cosmic microwave background and type Ia supernovae. Unifying EM and G would likely require a new postulate, but this would not necessarily mean getting rid of dark energy. The postulate would need to explain why there is a repulsive force between particles due to dark energy, and how this could be explained in terms of EM and G. This is an active area of research, and some physicists have proposed theories such as modified gravity models to explain dark energy. These theories attempt to explain dark energy as a modification of general relativity rather than a separate force.
 

Related to Dark Energy and EM/G unification.

1. What is dark energy?

Dark energy is a term used to describe the unknown force that is believed to be responsible for the observed acceleration of the expansion of the universe. It is thought to make up about 70% of the total energy in the universe and is thought to be a force that works in opposition to gravity.

2. How is dark energy related to EM/G unification?

EM/G unification is a theory that aims to unify the fundamental forces of electromagnetism and gravity into a single, coherent framework. Dark energy is thought to be a form of energy that pervades all of space and time, and its inclusion in the theory of EM/G unification is necessary to fully understand and explain the behavior of the universe.

3. What evidence do we have for the existence of dark energy?

The existence of dark energy is supported by several lines of evidence, including observations of the accelerating expansion of the universe, measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation, and the observed distribution of galaxies in the universe. These observations all point towards the presence of a mysterious force that is driving the expansion of the universe.

4. How does dark energy affect the universe?

Dark energy is thought to be the dominant force driving the expansion of the universe. It is believed to counteract the force of gravity, causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. This acceleration is thought to be responsible for the observed large-scale structure of the universe, as well as the distribution and movement of galaxies.

5. Can dark energy be harnessed or controlled?

At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that dark energy can be harnessed or controlled. It is a fundamental force of the universe and its nature and properties are still not fully understood. It is also extremely diffuse and difficult to detect or measure, making it unlikely that we will be able to manipulate it in any way in the near future.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
660
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
503
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
194
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
913
Back
Top