- #1
sanman
- 745
- 24
Anyone read about this?
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/17/274531.aspx
I'm not sure I agree with that part. I'd say that the effect in signal B would at best show up simultaneously as Cramer tampers with signal A.
Creating that longer circuitous route for signal A could be a way to simulate non-locality. After all, if signal A has to travel a longer route, it's as if it ends up at some distant location. So I suppose, in a technical way, simultaneity across non-local distances is a facsimile of time travel, but it isn't really genuine time travel.
This is like when Stephen Hawking said, "I think we can look into the past, but we can't alter it."
The Cramer experiment would work along the lines of Hawking's statement. Agree or disagree? Comments?
(Gee, how come nobody thought to do this experiment before, given all the investigation into these issues?)
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/07/17/274531.aspx
Now brace yourself for the backward-causality part: Because Signal B followed a shorter route to its detector, the fiddling in Signal A could theoretically show up in Signal B before Cramer actually fiddles with Signal A. It would be as if Cramer's actions had an effect that worked backward in time.
I'm not sure I agree with that part. I'd say that the effect in signal B would at best show up simultaneously as Cramer tampers with signal A.
Creating that longer circuitous route for signal A could be a way to simulate non-locality. After all, if signal A has to travel a longer route, it's as if it ends up at some distant location. So I suppose, in a technical way, simultaneity across non-local distances is a facsimile of time travel, but it isn't really genuine time travel.
This is like when Stephen Hawking said, "I think we can look into the past, but we can't alter it."
The Cramer experiment would work along the lines of Hawking's statement. Agree or disagree? Comments?
(Gee, how come nobody thought to do this experiment before, given all the investigation into these issues?)
Last edited by a moderator: