Why Use Time Derivative Outside the Integral in the Continuity Equation?

In summary, the conversation discusses the difference between two ways of writing the continuity equation and why the first method is preferred. The first integral involves computing the change in mass within a volume over time, while the second only considers changes in density. The second method is technically incorrect as it neglects any changes in volume, while the first method takes these changes into account. This is important for understanding the continuity equation in different scenarios.
  • #1
member 428835
Hi PF!

Can someone help me understand why, when writing the continuity equation we write: $$\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \iiint_v \rho \, dv$$ instead of $$ \iiint_v \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \rho \, dv$$

I understand the two are not necessarily the same, but why derive it the first way rather than the second?

Intuitively, the first seems to be saying "add up all the mass and then see how it changes in time" where as the second seems to say "see how density changes in time at each location and then add it all up".

I'm just having trouble understanding the second integral.

Thanks!

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you keep your volume fixed, the two are equivalent. This is usually how you will see the continuity equation on differential form derived.
 
  • #3
Yea, The same with energy and fluid balances. But I don't know what the second integral means, or rather why it's technically incorrect, from an intuitive perspective (mathematically I realize you need to use Leibniz' rule if the boundaries are time-dependent and you want to interchange the derivative and integral)

Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
 
  • #4
Well, "technically correct" depends on what you actually want to compute. Assuming that the volume is time dependent (since in the case where it is not the integrals are equivalent). The first integral gives you the change in the mass within a the volume by computing the mass as a function of time and then differentiating it. The second one only gives you the change of mass in the volume due to changes in the density and therefore neglects any contribution coming from the volume growing or shrinking (or moving!). As an example, consider a medium of constant density ##\rho##. The mass within the volume ##V(t)## will be given by ##M(t) = \rho V(t)## and so ##\dot M = \rho \dot V##. If you compute the density derivative ##\dot \rho##, you will get zero because you are neglecting the fact that the volume might change and therefore engulf more or less mass.
 

Related to Why Use Time Derivative Outside the Integral in the Continuity Equation?

1. What is the law of conservation of mass?

The law of conservation of mass states that mass is neither created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction. In other words, the total mass of the reactants must be equal to the total mass of the products.

2. Why is the law of conservation of mass important?

The law of conservation of mass is important because it is one of the fundamental principles in chemistry. It helps us understand and predict the outcome of chemical reactions and is essential in balancing chemical equations.

3. Is the law of conservation of mass always true?

Yes, the law of conservation of mass is always true in a closed system, where no matter can enter or leave. This means that the total mass of the system will remain constant, even if there is a chemical reaction taking place.

4. Can mass be converted into energy?

Yes, according to Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2, mass can be converted into energy and vice versa. However, the law of conservation of mass still applies, as the total mass and energy of a closed system will always remain constant.

5. How is the law of conservation of mass related to the law of conservation of energy?

The law of conservation of mass and the law of conservation of energy are both fundamental principles in physics and are closely related. They both state that in a closed system, the total amount of mass and energy will always remain constant, and they can be converted from one form to another, but cannot be created or destroyed.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
30
Views
842
Replies
22
Views
481
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top