Confusion abt relation betwn time travel and speed of light

In summary, according to theories proposed by researchers, time travel is dependent on the speed of light. While anything traveling faster than the speed of light would move back in time, anything traveling at the speed of light would remain stationary in time. However, there are two concepts of time in relativity - time as a coordinate and proper time. Proper time, or aging, is measured by a clock carried by the observer. In the case of light traveling at the speed of light, proper time does not advance and the observer does not age. This has implications for time travel, as getting close to the speed of light would allow for seeing the future due to the difference in proper time between the observer and the world around them.
  • #1
aritro88
1
0
i don't know in which section it belongs, so i am putting it here...

according to various theories proposed by various researchers, time travel depends on the speed of light. as far as i have read/heard -
i) anything traveling faster than the speed of light moves back in time.
ii) anything traveling AT the speed of light remains stationary in time.

now my question-
if light is traveling at the speed of light (obviously), then why does it take time to travel?

it (light beam/ray etc) should be stationary in time and should reach the destination the moment it leaves the light source.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
The backwards "solutions" are mostly nonsense. There is some sense in which it is true under GR, but it's far more complicated than that. Let's stay in realm of Special Relativity and stick to speeds up to speed of light.

There are two concepts of time in relativity. There is time as a coordinate and there is proper time. You can think of proper time as aging of something. In other words, a clock you carry with you will measure your proper time. Also, the proper time and coordinate time agree for an object that's at rest in your chosen coordinate system.

When we talk about time slowing down for moving objects, we are comparing time in different coordinate systems. Another way to look at it is that we compare proper time measured by two different observers.

Now, if we happen to have a clock moving along with the beam of light, which will measure proper time for that beam of light, in any other frame of reference, that clock will appear to stand still. The proper time does not advance for a system that travels at the speed of light. Such a system does not age.

The connection to time travel is pretty straight forward. If you wanted to see what the world is like thousands of years from now, all you have to do is get up to very near the speed of light. In that case, your proper time advances very little while proper time of the world around you advances a lot. Light speed is just the extreme case, where time for traveler would not advance at all.
 

Related to Confusion abt relation betwn time travel and speed of light

1. What is the relationship between time travel and the speed of light?

The relationship between time travel and the speed of light is complex and still not fully understood by scientists. However, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, time and space are intertwined and can be affected by an object's velocity. As an object approaches the speed of light, time slows down for that object relative to a stationary observer. This effect is known as time dilation and is a crucial concept in understanding time travel.

2. Can an object travel faster than the speed of light?

According to the current understanding of physics, it is not possible for an object to travel faster than the speed of light. This is because, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely and would require an infinite amount of energy to continue accelerating. This is known as the light speed barrier and is a fundamental principle in our understanding of the universe.

3. How does time travel relate to the concept of a "wormhole"?

Wormholes are hypothetical tunnels through space-time that could potentially allow for faster-than-light travel and, therefore, time travel. However, the existence of wormholes is still a matter of speculation and has not been proven to exist. Even if they do exist, the extreme gravitational forces inside a wormhole would make it incredibly dangerous for a human to travel through.

4. Is time travel possible?

The concept of time travel is still a subject of much debate and speculation among scientists. While some theories, such as the aforementioned wormholes, suggest that it could be possible, there is currently no scientific evidence to support the existence of time travel. Many scientists believe that the paradoxes and inconsistencies that arise from the concept of time travel make it unlikely to be feasible in reality.

5. How does the speed of light limit our ability to travel through time?

The speed of light is the fastest speed at which any object can travel in the universe. As mentioned earlier, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, making it impossible to accelerate further. This means that, even if time travel were possible, it would be limited by the light speed barrier and the immense amount of energy required to reach such speeds.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
461
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
646
  • Optics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top