CNN is a reliable and neutral source?

In summary: I also listen to Al Franken and Randi Rhoads, and The Majority Report because they CITE their information and use news reports not editorials when establishing facts in a situation. (Al is my high Brow, Randi is my Medium Brow and TMR is a nice mix of medium to low brow (depending on Sam's mood)
  • #1
Ratzinger
291
0
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.
 
  • #3
Ratzinger said:
Do you think that CNN is a reliable and neutral source? Is their covering balanced and independent? Can they be trusted?

Well... In my opinion, CNN is much more balanced than the "Fair and Balanced" Network.

I think the Fox Slogan is short for "We give a FAIR Right Wing assessment, AND our anchors are mentally BALANCED"
 
  • #4
Tide said:
There is no such thing as a neutral and totally reliable source. CNN is as reliable as any other new organization. One feature they have that puts them head and shoulders above the competition is their coverage of science and technology which either doesn't exist or is virtually lacking in their competitors' broadcasts.

Well on Fox, they do not air science because it is full of "just theories" not "facts", and movie stars provide a much better escape than boring science.
 
  • #5
CG,

Yes, that is a definite shortcoming of FNC.
 
  • #6
i don't think we should talk about cnn but of his mother company which is AOL-

Time Warner
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner.asp
Time Warner Corporate Timeline
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/timewarner-timeline.asp

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=19&media_outlet_id=9
http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/outlets/cnn


TIME-WARNER TBS - AOL donated 1.6 million to GW's 2000 campaign


examples:

CNN, Fox tout ABC/Post poll showing increase in Bush approval ratings, ignore own polls showing no improvement or a decrease
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512210002

CNN Says Focus on Civilian Casualties Would Be "Perverse"
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1670

Early this month, new CNN chairman Walter Isaacson met with top Republican lawmakers in Washington, D.C. to discuss how to improve relations between the cable news network and conservative Republicans.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1677


"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one."

The Mass Media & Politics: An Analysis of Influence
http://progressiveliving.org/mass_media_and_politics.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
How much to Al Gore?

Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.
 
  • #8
ComputerGeek said:
How much to Al Gore?
Recall, they were trying to merge TW and AOL at the time and certainly did not want to alienate either potential leader.

Anyway, that shows they are not impartial, non partisan, and objective..
 
Last edited:
  • #10
  • #11
So what is a good source?
 
  • #13
moose said:
The fact was that Bush said it, not the actual statement. !
i know. i know, but it's kind of tricky and funny. that is why i put the :smile: :smile:

Anyway, delete it if you want, i don't want to trash te thread...
 
  • #14
Well.. I do not watch Cable news.. I use the Internet to gather my information... I have more access to in-depth reporting, both opinions, and discussion, allowing me to formulate an opinion...

I also listen to Al Franken and Randi Rhoads, and The Majority Report because they CITE their information and use news reports not editorials when establishing facts in a situation. (Al is my high Brow, Randi is my Medium Brow and TMR is a nice mix of medium to low brow (depending on Sam's mood)
 

Related to CNN is a reliable and neutral source?

What makes CNN a reliable source?

CNN has a well-established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy in reporting. They have a team of experienced journalists and editors who adhere to strict ethical standards.

How does CNN ensure neutrality in their reporting?

CNN strives to present information from multiple perspectives and sources in their reporting. They also have a code of ethics that requires journalists to maintain neutrality and avoid bias in their reporting.

Are there any concerns about CNN's reliability and neutrality?

Like any news source, CNN has had instances where they have made mistakes or been accused of bias. However, they have a transparent corrections policy and a commitment to addressing any concerns about their reporting.

How does CNN handle controversial topics in their reporting?

CNN has a responsibility to report on important and often polarizing issues. They strive to present balanced coverage by including perspectives from all sides of the debate and fact-checking claims made by sources.

Is CNN's online reporting as reliable and neutral as their television reporting?

While some may argue that online reporting is more susceptible to bias or misinformation, CNN has a rigorous fact-checking process in place for all of their reporting, regardless of the platform. They also have a team dedicated to monitoring and verifying information on social media and online sources.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
794
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
204
  • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top