Case when the potential energy of the 1st excited state is zero

In summary: V right?Actually you are right. The problem says potential energy is zero and not the total energy. But... if the potential energy is zero then the kinetic energy must be 13.6eV right?
  • #1
PSN03
100
9
Homework Statement
For a neutral hydrogen atom where the ground state energy of the electron is taken as E=-13.6eV (with standard reference). Now if the potential energy of the first excited state is taken as zero reference potential energy then the potential energy of the third excited state is.
Relevant Equations
E=-13.6/n² where n is the orbit number.
Standard potential energy at infinity is zero.
I know how to solve this problem when the energy at ground state is zero but I don't know how to deal with 1st excited state energy as zero.
According to me since the potential energy is zero therefore the kinetic energy must be 13.6eV according to conservation of energy.
I also know that the energy is inversely proportional to the square of orbit number.
I don't know how to proceed further after this. Any kind of help or even a hint would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is just a change of reference point for potential energy. You're overthinking things.
 
  • #3
Can u please give me some hints cause I can't think in other direction
 
  • #4
PSN03 said:
Can u please give me some hints cause I can't think in other direction
It says in the question:

PSN03 said:
Homework Statement:: For a neutral hydrogen atom where the ground state energy of the electron is taken as E=-13.6eV (with standard reference).
What's the "standard reference"?
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
It says in the question:What's the "standard reference"?
The standard reference is infinity I guess. Cause at infinity the potential energy becomes zero so any potential energy below that is negative
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #6
PSN03 said:
The standard reference is infinity I guess. Cause at infinity the potential energy becomes zero so any potential energy below that is negative

Yes.

I suggest you first write down the energies of the relevant states in the standrad reference.
 
  • Like
Likes PSN03
  • #7
PeroK said:
Yes.

I suggest you first write down the energies of the relevant states in the standrad reference.
Yes I have done that.
At standard state the energy of 2nd excited state is -13.6/3²=-1.51 and 3rd excited state is -0.85eV
 
  • #8
PSN03 said:
Yes I have done that.
At standard state the energy of 2nd excited state is -13.6/3²=-1.51 and 3rd excited state is -0.85eV
I thought you wanted the first excited state and to take that as you new zero potential?
 
  • #9
PeroK said:
I thought you wanted the first excited state and to take that as you new zero potential?
Yes that's exactly what has to be done with the new frame of reference. But I was answering it with respect to the old frame of potential energy. I don't know how to deal it with new frame of reference.
 
  • #10
PSN03 said:
Yes that's exactly what has to be done with the new frame of reference. But I was answering it with respect to the old frame of potential energy. I don't know how to deal it with new frame of reference.
Why didn't you calculate the energy of the first excited state?
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
Why didn't you calculate the energy of the first excited state?
I don't know how to find that in the new frame of reference. In the old frame it's -3.4eV
 
  • #12
PSN03 said:
I don't know how to find that in the new frame of reference. In the old frame it's -3.4eV

Have you learned about things like the Bohr Radius?
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
Have you learned about things like the Bohr Radius?
Yes I have learned about it.
 
  • #14
PSN03 said:
Yes I have learned about it.
Do you know the radius applicable to the energy states?
 
  • #15
PeroK said:
Do you know the radius applicable to the energy states?
According to my knowledge energy is inversely proportional to the square of radius.
E=k/n²
 
  • #16
PSN03 said:
According to my knowledge energy is inversely proportional to the square of radius.
E=k/n²
Okay, but you need to find the potential energy for each of these states. To do that you need to define the potential energy for each of these states. I assume you are supposed to calculate the potential for the 3rd Bohr radius and use that as the new zero. That being the second excited state.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
Okay, but you need to find the potential energy for each of these states. To do that you need to define the potential energy for each of these states. I assume you are supposed to calculate the potential for the 3rd Bohr radius and use that as the new zero. That being the second excited state.
According to me me we are given that the energy of the 2nd excited state is zero and we are supposed to find the subsequent energy of the third excited state.
 
  • #18
PSN03 said:
According to me me we are given that the energy of the 2nd excited state is zero and we are supposed to find the subsequent energy of the third excited state.
That's one interpretation. Then the problem is very easy.

But, it does say "potential" energy. Which suggests that they want you to calculate the potential energy for the 2nd excited state. That would involve putting an appropriate radius into the Coulomb potential.

Perhaps you might want to confirm which it is?
 
  • #19
PeroK said:
That's one interpretation. Then the problem is very easy.

But, it does say "potential" energy. Which suggests that they want you to calculate the potential energy for the 2nd excited state. That would involve putting an appropriate radius into the Coulomb potential.

Perhaps you might want to confirm which it is?
Actually you are right. The problem says potential energy is zero and not the total energy.
But why should I calculate the potential energy for 2nd excited state?
 
  • #20
PSN03 said:
Actually you are right. The problem says potential energy is zero and not the total energy.
But why should I calculate the potential energy for 2nd excited state?
I believe the expected value of the Coulomb potential involves ##r_n = an^2##, where ##a## is the Bohr radius. I would use that.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
I believe the expected value of the Coulomb potential involves ##r_n = an^2##, where ##a## is the Bohr radius. I would use that.
Yes that's absolutely right but it only gives us the radius of nth orbit. How to deal it with the new frame of reference?
 
  • #22
PSN03 said:
Yes that's absolutely right but it only gives us the radius of nth orbit. How to deal it with the new frame of reference?
There no frame of reference involved. There is only a zero point for potential energy.
 
  • #23
PeroK said:
There no frame of reference involved. There is only a zero point for potential energy.
Oh actually I meant that 2nd orbital should be new reference point for the potential energy...right?
 
  • #24
PSN03 said:
Oh actually I meant that 2nd orbital should be new reference point for the potential energy...right?
Yes.
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
Yes.
What to do after this. I mean how will this new frame affect the energy of the electron?
 
  • #26
PSN03 said:
What to do after this. I mean how will this new frame affect the energy of the electron?
Try to work out the potential energy of the first excited state. Until you have done that you can't go any further.
 
  • #27
PeroK said:
Try to work out the potential energy of the first excited state. Until you have done that you can't go any further.
The potential energy of first excited state would be -13.6*2/4=6.8eV in old reference frame. In new reference frame it's given to be zero.
 
  • #28
PSN03 said:
The potential energy of first excited state would be -13.6*2/4=6.8eV in old reference frame. In new reference frame it's given to be zero.
If you mean ##-6.8 eV## that's right.
 
  • #29
PeroK said:
If you mean ##-6.8 eV## that's right.
Yes -6.8eV ...but after this.
The new energy is 0 therefore +6.8eV has been supplied and the change in energy is of 6.8-(-6.8)=13.6eV.
 
  • #30
PSN03 said:
Yes -6.8eV ...but after this.
The new energy is 0 therefore +6.8eV has been supplied and the change in energy is of 6.8-(-6.8)=13.6eV.
It's the (potential) energy of the third excited state you want.
 
  • #31
PSN03 said:
Yes -6.8eV ...but after this.
The new energy is 0 therefore +6.8eV has been supplied and the change in energy is of 6.8-(-6.8)=13.6eV.

This calculation is wrong. You need some notation. Let's have: ##E_n, V_n## for the original energy and potential energy of the hydrogen energy states; and. ##E'_n, V'_n## for the energies with the changed zero potential to be at the first excited state.

I suggest you should write them all down so you can see the pattern.
 
  • #32
PeroK said:
This calculation is wrong. You need some notation. Let's have: ##E_n, V_n## for the original energy and potential energy of the hydrogen energy states; and. ##E'_n, V'_n## for the energies with the changed zero potential to be at the first excited state.

I suggest you should write them all down so you can see the pattern.
Ohk...
So
##E_1##=-13.6
##E_2##=-3.4
##E_3##=-1.51
##E_4##=-0.85
##V_2##=-6.8
##V_3##=-3.02
##V_4##=-1.7

##V'_2##=0
 
  • #33
It's ##V'_4## you want, isn't it?
 
  • #34
PeroK said:
It's ##V'_4## you want, isn't it?
Yes but how to go about it?
 
  • #35
PSN03 said:
Yes but how to go about it?
You're so close!

Try this question: what is the new potential ##V'## at infinity now?
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
382
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
162
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
797
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
377
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
974
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top