Cardinality argument in the Casimir effect

In summary, there is an argument for the Casimir effect based on cardinalities, which suggests that there will be a higher energy density outside than inside due to the countable infinity of photons with specific wavelengths between the plates. However, this argument runs into a problem when considering two photons of equal energy to be distinct, as the total energy also depends on their amplitudes. Additionally, there are other explanations for the Casimir effect and the cardinality argument may not hold water due to sloppy counting and the need to compare finite volumes.
  • #1
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,671
204
There is an argument to account for the Casimir effect based on cardinalities: that inside the two plates only (virtual) photons with wavelengths corresponding to the harmonic series can exist, hence countable infinity, whereas photons of all wavelengths can exist in the space around it, hence uncountable infinity. Therefore, the argument goes, there will be a higher energy density outside than inside. This argument seems to run into a problem if one can one consider two photons of equal energy to be distinct. (After all, wouldn't the total energy also depend on the amplitudes for each wavelength?) In this case, the cardinality of the possible wavelengths of the waves between the plates may be countable while the number of waves could be uncountable. This would then end up with the same energy density. That is, supposing that at every point in the continuum number of points in the space between the plates there is a distinct wave, then although the range of values of the waves between the plates is restricted to members of a harmonic sequence, the fact that there is a continuum number of points between the plates would also give you a continuum number of waves inside as outside. So, am I missing something, or can this argument be repaired? There are other explanations of the Casimir effect, but I would sooooo much like a cardinality argument to go through.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think the cardinality argument ever held water. I know people argue for the Casimir effect that way but I think it's sloppy counting and the method is not repairable.

The reason it doesn't work is that the infinite density of continuum states is balanced by the fact that an individual photon in anyone of those states could be infinitely far from the plates, and its probable effect is accordingly downweighted. A correct Casimir analysis can best be done comparing finite volumes: large versus small.
 
  • #3


I would say that the cardinality argument in the Casimir effect is an interesting idea, but it is not a complete or conclusive explanation for the phenomenon. While it is true that the number of possible wavelengths inside the plates may be countable and outside may be uncountable, this does not necessarily lead to a higher energy density outside. As mentioned in the argument, the amplitudes of the waves also play a role in determining the total energy. Additionally, the argument assumes that there is a distinct wave at every point in the continuum between the plates, which may not be the case.

Furthermore, there are other factors at play in the Casimir effect, such as the geometry and material properties of the plates, which cannot be fully explained by the cardinality argument alone. As scientists, we must consider all possible explanations and evidence before drawing conclusions.

While the idea of a cardinality argument in the Casimir effect is intriguing, it is important to continue to explore and test different explanations in order to fully understand this phenomenon.
 

Related to Cardinality argument in the Casimir effect

1. What is the "cardinality argument" in the Casimir effect?

The cardinality argument in the Casimir effect is a mathematical concept used to explain the phenomenon of vacuum energy and its effects on objects in close proximity to each other. It involves the idea that the vacuum state contains an infinite number of virtual particles, which can contribute to the Casimir force between two objects.

2. How does the cardinality argument relate to the Casimir effect?

The cardinality argument provides a theoretical explanation for the Casimir effect, which is a physical force observed between two uncharged, parallel plates placed in a vacuum. This effect is caused by the difference in the number of virtual particles outside and between the plates, resulting in a net force pushing the plates together.

3. What evidence supports the use of the cardinality argument in the Casimir effect?

Experimental evidence for the Casimir effect has been observed in numerous studies, providing support for the use of the cardinality argument. Additionally, theoretical calculations based on the concept of vacuum energy and the presence of virtual particles have been shown to accurately predict the magnitude of the Casimir force.

4. Are there any limitations to the cardinality argument in the Casimir effect?

While the cardinality argument has been successful in explaining the Casimir effect, it is not a complete explanation for the phenomenon. Other factors, such as the geometry and material properties of the plates, can also affect the magnitude of the Casimir force. Additionally, the exact nature of virtual particles and their role in the Casimir effect is still not fully understood.

5. How does the cardinality argument in the Casimir effect impact other areas of physics?

The cardinality argument has implications beyond just the Casimir effect, as it is related to the concept of vacuum energy and its effects on the universe. This idea has been explored in fields such as quantum field theory and cosmology, and has led to new insights and theories about the nature of space and time.

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
788
Replies
4
Views
869
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
958
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
808
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top