Capturing Nature's Small Wonders: Comparison of Camera Configurations

In summary, the author compares three camera setups for capturing small creatures big on the screen: with a Panasonic FZ-18 bridge camera, with a Canon 450D and with a 100mm macro lens. The author is happy with the 100mm macro lens.
  • #1
Andre
4,311
74
It's a great joy to capture small creatures big on the screen without them even noticing it. There are several ways to do that. I used to utilize my old Panasonic FZ-18 bridge camera with a close up lens. Preferably #2 or 2 dioptries or 50 cm focus distance, with a moderate zoom 8-12x you get nice results.

Then came the Canon 450D and the same close up lens on the 70-300mm tele zoom at around 220 mm focus would give roughly the same magnification and shooting distance, however it's a lot to carry all day.

Then I decided to go for the 100mm macro lens, which is a bit a beast to handle with the large focus range. I kept wondering however if it was worthwhile. So today I did some comparison shots of a small (ca 5mm) spider and Althea flowers with all three configurations, all free hand. I compared 100% crops of the three, left the FZ18 with close up lens. In the center the canon with 100mm macro and to the right the70-300 zoom with close up lens. I think I'm happy with the 100mm macro lens, while it's not a good idea to use the tele with close up lens instead. Although I may settle for the FZ-18, if dragging equipment around was a factor.

All are unedited original jpgs

Original with the FZ18 (20% size):

312zdjk.jpg


The 100% crops:

k2gra.jpg


Original with the FZ18 (20% size):

4l2fti.jpg


The 100% crops

358rvc4.jpg


Notice little difference in the petal due to the limited depth of field. But notice the difference of the pollen grains on the stamen.

Anybody with similar experiences?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you can properly take macro shots while maintaining technical photography then its a really great and rewarding thing to do. I really like pictures of water drops sometimes u can get reflections in them i think that is amazing
 
  • #3
That 100mm macro is a sweet lens, Andre. I've been thinking about getting one, but nobody in the US has them in stock. They're back-ordered.
 
  • #4
I have Nikon's 105mm macro and it's pretty sweet. I haven't made a trip to go chase bugs with it yet, but I'll see if I can do that soon and share.

Here's one I made using my kitchen table as a studio. I reversed a 20mm lens in front of the 105mm macro, giving me approximately 5:1 magnification (and a very short working distance), although the image is not very sharp, so I probably won't use this configuration again in the future. This is coarse table salt (the kind that you put in a salt grinder):

3613117142_0e1d79108c.jpg
 
  • #5
@Sorry!, great idea, I intend to try that tomorrow and post the results,

@Turbo, yes I'm quite happy with that glass. Curious that withdrawal. They are in stock here.

@Ben, yes the Nikon 105 is great glass, a direct comparison between Nikon and Canon is alway interesting. Pixel counting Canon wins according to that site but Nikon has vibration reduction and that's a big pro.
 

Related to Capturing Nature's Small Wonders: Comparison of Camera Configurations

1. What is the purpose of "Capturing Nature's Small Wonders: Comparison of Camera Configurations"?

The purpose of this study is to compare different camera configurations in capturing small wonders of nature. This includes examining the image quality, depth of field, and other factors that may affect the final result.

2. What are the different camera configurations being compared in this study?

The study compares three different camera configurations: a DSLR camera with a macro lens, a point-and-shoot camera with a macro setting, and a smartphone camera with a clip-on macro lens.

3. How were the images captured and compared in this study?

The researchers took multiple images of the same subject using each camera configuration under controlled conditions. The images were then analyzed and compared based on factors such as sharpness, color accuracy, and depth of field.

4. What were the results of the study?

The results showed that the DSLR camera with a macro lens produced the highest quality images, followed by the point-and-shoot camera with a macro setting. The smartphone camera with a clip-on macro lens produced the lowest quality images, but still had satisfactory results.

5. How can this study benefit photographers and nature enthusiasts?

This study can help photographers and nature enthusiasts make informed decisions when choosing a camera for capturing small wonders of nature. It also provides tips and techniques for maximizing the capabilities of each camera configuration to achieve the best results.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top