Can Up Quark Absorb Negative W Particle to Become Strange?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of an up quark absorbing a negative W particle and becoming a strange quark. It is mentioned that this process can always go both ways as long as energy is conserved. The conversation also delves into the postulation of a fourth quark, charm, due to discrepancies between experimental and expected rates of a three quark model. It is noted that the transition amplitude between d and t quarks is very small, making transitions from down/strange to top unlikely.
  • #1
KBriggs
33
0
Can an up quark absorb a negative W particle and become a strange quark? I know s can turn into u via the opposite process (emission of positive W), but can the interaction go the other way?

This arises when trying to draw the Feynman diagram for the rather unlikely decay

[tex]B^+\to D_s^++\bar{K^0}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
The process can always go both ways, as long as energy is conserved.
 
  • #4
Thanks. I guess then the only quark that could not be reached this way would be top quark, since its mass is so much larger than the mass of the W bosons.
 
  • #5
An interesting question, related to this, was why experimentally the calculated rates of the process didn't match with the expected for a three quarks model, so a fourth quark, the charm, was postulated. See GIM mechanism.
 
  • #6
KBriggs said:
Thanks. I guess then the only quark that could not be reached this way would be top quark, since its mass is so much larger than the mass of the W bosons.

Hey, with enough accelerator energy everything is possible :wink: The top mass is 175 GeV, and the available energy at for example LHC ([itex]\sqrt{\hat{s}}[/itex] ) is probably a couple of TeV, i.e. many times the top mass

Though you are correct in your reasoning, the transition amplitude between d and t quarks is a very small number, so transitions from down/strange to top are very unlikely. See Wiki: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, the numbers to look for are non-diagonal ones in the third row, these describe transitions between top and lighter down-type quarks.
 

Related to Can Up Quark Absorb Negative W Particle to Become Strange?

1. Can an up quark absorb a negative W particle to become a strange quark?

Yes, this is possible through a process called weak interaction. The up quark can absorb a negative W particle, which then converts it into a strange quark.

2. What is the significance of this process in particle physics?

This process is significant because it helps explain the conversion of one type of quark into another. It also plays a role in the decay of particles, such as in the decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron.

3. Can this process occur in reverse, with a strange quark emitting a negative W particle to become an up quark?

Yes, this process can occur in reverse through weak interaction. A strange quark can emit a negative W particle, which then converts it into an up quark.

4. Are there any other particles involved in this process?

Yes, besides the up and strange quarks and the negative W particle, there is also a neutrino involved in this process. The neutrino is a neutral, weakly interacting particle that carries away energy and momentum.

5. Is this process only limited to up and strange quarks or can it occur with other types of quarks as well?

This process can occur with other types of quarks as well, such as the top and bottom quarks. However, it is less likely to occur with heavier quarks due to their larger masses.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
362
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top