Can Dark Matter just be vacuum fluctuations?

In summary, there have been theories proposed that model Dark Matter as the pressure from vacuum fluctuations, but this does not account for the observed attractive gravity of dark matter and is more similar to dark energy. It is still an open question whether this calculation makes sense or if there is a reason for the discrepancy. Additionally, the mismatch of matter and gravitational forces is purely based on classical mechanics and not related to any potential factors like 2Pi.
  • #1
bbbl67
212
21
Has there been any theories proposed that model Dark Matter as just the pressure from vacuum fluctuations? It would be just a big cosmological-scale version of the Casimir Effect, where instead of using a couple of plates separated by microns, we're using the gravity wells of galaxies to create low-pressure regions of space, separated across thousands or millions of light-years.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quantum field theory allows to estimate an energy density of those quantum fluctuations - but that estimate is a factor 10120 too high. It is an open question if
(a) that calculation makes sense at all,
(b) there is some particular reason why our estimate is way off, or
(c) we do not understand the problem.

Either way, dark energy is not just a casimir-like effect, because that is absolutely negligible on cosmological distances.
 
  • #3
Are we talking dark matter or dark energy here?
 
  • #4
Oh, good point. The QFT vacuum doesn't have any connection to dark matter so I read "dark energy" somehow.
 
  • #5
bbbl67 said:
Has there been any theories proposed that model Dark Matter as just the pressure from vacuum fluctuations?

No, because that pressure behaves the wrong way to account for dark matter. The pressure due to vacuum fluctuations causes repulsive gravity--it behaves like dark energy. But whatever it is that dark matter turns out to be, it must have attractive gravity, like ordinary matter, because it's the presence of "extra" attractive gravity--i.e., more of it than can be accounted for by the matter we can see--that signals the presence of dark matter.
 
  • #6
PeterDonis said:
But whatever it is that dark matter turns out to be, it must have attractive gravity, like ordinary matter, because it's the presence of "extra" attractive gravity--i.e., more of it than can be accounted for by the matter we can see--that signals the presence of dark matter.
Not necessarily, if our calculated matter continues to = ordinary matter * 2 Pi (+/-3%) we may just be missing a translation factor of 2 Pi somewhere. If this turned out to be the case a simple correction would lead to much less dark matter along with minimal attractive gravity.

It's interesting to note that basic equations when solved for m, that contain the reduced Compton wavelength XOR the reduced Planck constant have an implicit 2 Pi present in their most basic forms UNLESS the equation includes phase velocity then things will be reversed and 2 Pi becomes implicit in the other equation forms where (standard Compton wavelength AND standard Planck constant) OR (reduced Compton wavelength AND reduced Planck constant) appear. So, coming around full circle, equations that contain the reduced Compton wavelength XOR the reduced Planck constant will NOT have an implicit 2Pi present in their basic forms if they are solved for m and phase velocity is present.
 
  • #7
Laurie K said:
Not necessarily, if our calculated matter continues to = ordinary matter * 2 Pi (+/-3%) we may just be missing a translation factor of 2 Pi somewhere. If this turned out to be the case a simple correction would lead to much less dark matter along with minimal attractive gravity.
No, that does not work. We know the gravitational attraction between regular matter very well - we can measure it in a lab. The gravitational constant is measured in that way. There is no additional factor around.
Laurie K said:
It's interesting to note that basic equations when solved for m, that contain the reduced Compton wavelength XOR the reduced Planck constant have an implicit 2 Pi present in their most basic forms UNLESS the equation includes phase velocity then things will be reversed and 2 Pi becomes implicit in the other equation forms where (standard Compton wavelength AND standard Planck constant) OR (reduced Compton wavelength AND reduced Planck constant) appear. So, coming around full circle, equations that contain the reduced Compton wavelength XOR the reduced Planck constant will NOT have an implicit 2Pi present in their basic forms if they are solved for m and phase velocity is present.
That does not make sense, but it is completely irrelevant anyway - the mismatch of matter and gravitational forces is purely based on classical mechanics.
 

Related to Can Dark Matter just be vacuum fluctuations?

1. What is dark matter?

Dark matter is a type of matter that does not interact with light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is invisible and does not emit or absorb light, making it difficult to detect.

2. How does dark matter relate to vacuum fluctuations?

Some theories suggest that dark matter could be the result of vacuum fluctuations, which are fluctuations or changes in energy in empty space. These fluctuations could potentially produce particles that make up dark matter.

3. Can vacuum fluctuations explain all dark matter in the universe?

At this time, it is unclear if vacuum fluctuations can account for all the dark matter in the universe. While they could potentially produce some dark matter particles, there is evidence that there must be other types of dark matter as well.

4. How do scientists study dark matter and vacuum fluctuations?

Scientists use a variety of methods to study dark matter and vacuum fluctuations, including observations of the effects of dark matter on the movements of galaxies and the use of particle accelerators to try and create and detect dark matter particles. They also use mathematical models and simulations to better understand these phenomena.

5. What are the implications of dark matter being vacuum fluctuations?

If dark matter is indeed the result of vacuum fluctuations, it could have a significant impact on our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It could also potentially lead to new theories and discoveries in the field of particle physics.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
961
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top