Calculating $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ in Quantum Field Theory

In summary: The delta function is there to enforce causality, and the integral of x/(x^2+e^2) times a smooth test function is equivalent to integrating against a test function that goes to zero as x gets closer to e.
  • #1
koolmodee
51
0
[tex]\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{x}{x²+a²}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{ia}{x²+a²}[/tex]= P [tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex]+i pi [tex]\delta[/tex](x)

P means the principal value, a is possibly infinitesimal (?), i is the imaginary unit

Where does the pi, Dirac delta come from? What principal value?
It is from a quantum field theory book.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The expression contains a Dirac Delta, so that should be your clue to integrate against a test function, [itex]\varphi(x)[/itex] that goes to zero as [itex]x \rightarrow \pm \infty[/itex]. In particular, you want to consider a contour integral

[tex]\int_\gamma dz \frac{\varphi(z)}{z - i\epsilon} [/tex]

about some contour [itex]\gamma[/itex]. Note that the integrand has a pole at [itex]z = i\varepsilon[/itex]. To evaluate, consider the closed contour in the upper half plane that consists of a large semicircle of radius R with a small semicircle of radius b around the pole in the integrand at [itex]z = i\varepsilon[/itex]. Since the contour contains no poles, the contour integral is zero. Parameterize the contour:

[tex]\int_{-R}^{-b}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon} + \int_{b}^{R}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon} + \int_0^{\pi}d(Re^{i\theta}) \frac{\varphi(Re^{i\theta})}{Re^{i\theta}-i\varepsilon} + \int_\pi^{0}d(be^{i\theta}) \frac{\varphi(be^{i\theta})}{be^{i\theta}-i\varepsilon} = 0[/tex]

Now, take the limits as [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and [itex]b \rightarrow 0[/itex], and use the definition of the principal part integral:

[tex]\mathcal{P}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx~f(x) = \lim_{a \rightarrow 0} \int_{-\infty}^{-a}dx~f(x) + \int_{a}^{\infty}dx~f(x)[/tex]

and the half-residue theorem, that states that for a semi-circular arc about a pole, the contribution from that arc about the pole as the radius goes to zero is [itex]2\pi i[/itex] times half the residue about that pole. To get the delta function you note that at the pole the test function will give a contribution [itex]\varphi(0)[/itex], and so the action of the imaginary part of [itex](x - i\epsilon)^{-1}[/itex] is to pick out the value of the test function at the origin, which is just what a Dirac delta does. In the end you can set [itex]\epsilon = 0[/itex].
 
  • #3
Mute, thanks so much!
 
  • #4
WAIT!

In my OP there was a mistake! I'm very sorry.

It is x/(x²+a²)+ia/(x²+a²) = P 1/x + i pi delta(x) and a possibly infinitesimal.

So RHS are two innocent algebraic terms, the LHS has something to two with integration.

I still can't see how that works.
 
  • #5
The [itex]\epsilon[/tex] is an infinitesimal. It's there to enforce causality. You can set it to zero after you do your integrals over the left hand side because after that causality has been enforced and you don't need the infinitesimal anymore.

The right hand side of the expression only makes sense inside an integral. What it says is that when you integrate

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon}[/tex]

it's equivalent to integrating

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \left[\mathcal{P}\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + i\pi \delta(x)\right]\varphi(x) = \mathcal{P}\left[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx~\frac{\varphi(x)}{x}\right] + i\pi \varphi(0)[/tex].
 
  • #6
I really appreciate the effort Mute, but I can't see what you mean here.
 
  • #7
I wrote the author and he was so kind answering me. If anybody interested here is what he wrote.

It's pretty easy to see how the delta function part works; for any
nonzero x, the function e/(x^2+e^2) goes
to zero as e goes to zero, but the area under it is pi for any e; so it
behaves like pi times delta(x) as e->0.

The principle-value part works similarly; one needs to show that the
integral of x/(x^2+e^2) times a smooth
test function f(x) equals, in the limit e->0, the principle value of
the integral of (1/x)f(x). (To get the principle value,
one replaces (1/x) with zero when -e<x<e, then takes the limit e->0
after doing the integral.)

After comparing that with what Mute said, I think that I understand it now.
 

Related to Calculating $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ in Quantum Field Theory

1. How is $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ used in Quantum Field Theory?

In Quantum Field Theory, $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ is used as a mathematical tool for regulating and manipulating divergent integrals. It is often used in the context of renormalization, where it helps to remove infinities from calculations and make predictions about physical observables.

2. What does the $\epsilon$ in $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ represent?

The $\epsilon$ in $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ is a small positive number that is introduced as a regulator in order to prevent singularities from arising in the integrals. It is often interpreted as a small imaginary part of the integration variable, which helps to shift the contour of integration away from singularities and make the integral well-defined.

3. How does $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ relate to the concept of causality in Quantum Field Theory?

In Quantum Field Theory, $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ is used to implement the principle of causality, which states that no signal can travel faster than the speed of light. By introducing a small imaginary part through $\epsilon$, it ensures that the propagator (the amplitude for a particle to travel from one point to another) is zero outside of the light cone, thus preserving causality.

4. Can $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ be extended to other mathematical contexts?

Yes, the concept of $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ can be extended to other areas of mathematics, such as complex analysis and singular integrals. In these contexts, it is used as a regularization technique to deal with singularities and make integrals well-defined.

5. Are there any limitations to using $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ in Quantum Field Theory?

While $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ is a useful tool in Quantum Field Theory, it does have limitations. For example, it can lead to non-unitary theories and does not always give physically meaningful results. Additionally, it is a mathematical tool and should not be interpreted as a physical quantity. It is important to carefully consider its use and the implications on physical predictions.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
174
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
466
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
610
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
405
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
761
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
824
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
861
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
344
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
819
Back
Top