Bush Plays the Secrecy Card Once More.

  • News
  • Thread starter edward
  • Start date
In summary, the Administration is using a little known Supreme court ruling to avoid turning over full information on Jack Abramoff's visits to the White House.
  • #1
edward
62
166
The Administration is using a little known Supreme court ruling to avoid turning over full information on Jack Abramoff's visits to the White House.


The Bush administration is invoking a secrecy defense known as Glomarization [DOJ backgrounder] to avoid disclosing hundreds of documents concerning White House visits by former lobbyist Jack Abramoff [JURIST news archive], according to AP citing court papers filed Friday. The administration is relying on a 1976 US Supreme Court ruling in Phillippi v. CIA, a case which arose in the context of inquiries concerning an alleged CIA connection with the Glomar Explorer, Howard Hughes' submarine retrieval ship.

Phillippi established the right of government agencies to flatly deny the existence of records pertaining to investigations, if acknowledging the existence of the records would, in itself, reveal exempt information. The Department of Justice claims in the Abramoff case that releasing the requested information would reveal sensitive information about Secret Service's protective function. The administration's denial comes despite a promise last year to produce all records concerning Abramoff.

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/12/bush-administration-invoking-secrecy.php

For those of you who don't remember, the Glomar Explorer was a specialized ship built by Howard Hughes. It was used to try to secretly raise a sunken Russian submarine. The ship was disguised as a research ship and had a hidden underwater opening.

I am thinking that the sub broke into two pieces and we didn't get the half we wanted.

As for Abramoff's visits to the White House I seriously doubt that the Secret service would be revealing it's methods if they simply sent a schedule of the visits to the Congress.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lawyers, they will try anything.

This is why we need good federal judges.

Wait, this is a request by Congress and not in Federal court?

What powers does Congress have in this situation?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
kach22i said:
What powers does Congress have in this situation?
Congress has the power to subpoena the documents. The Administration will continue to stonewall them so that Congress can't determine Abramoff's access to the White House. Congress will appeal to the DOJ, and the Attorney General will in all likelihood refuse to enforce the subpoenas. That's the way this little kingdom works.
 

Related to Bush Plays the Secrecy Card Once More.

What is the context of "Bush Plays the Secrecy Card Once More."?

The phrase "Bush Plays the Secrecy Card Once More." refers to the actions of former United States President George W. Bush in using the concept of national security to justify withholding information from the public.

Why did Bush use the "secrecy card"?

Bush believed that certain information, such as details about the War on Terror and national security strategies, needed to be kept secret in order to protect the country from potential threats.

What is the controversy surrounding Bush's use of the "secrecy card"?

The controversy stems from concerns that Bush may have used the concept of national security as a way to avoid accountability and scrutiny for his actions and policies, which could potentially violate civil liberties and human rights.

How did the public react to Bush's use of the "secrecy card"?

The public response was mixed, with some supporting Bush's actions as necessary for national security, while others criticized his lack of transparency and perceived abuse of power.

Has any action been taken to address this issue?

In response to criticism, the Obama administration implemented policies to increase government transparency and limit the use of the "secrecy card" in order to balance national security concerns with the public's right to information.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
66
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
7
Replies
238
Views
25K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
90
Views
9K
Back
Top