Bounded Sequence: Thomas-Finney Definition Explained

Therefore, the sequence is bounded.In summary, a bounded sequence is one where all the terms lie within a certain range, defined by a real number M. This can also be expressed as -M ≤ an ≤ M. However, even if all the terms fall within a different range, such as -3 to 1, it is still considered a bounded sequence.
  • #1
Ryuzaki
46
0
Thomas-Finney defines a bounded sequence as follows: -

A sequence an is said to be bounded if there exists a real number M such that |an| ≤ M for all n belonging to natural numbers.

This is equivalent to saying -M ≤ an ≤ M

So, if all terms of a sequence lies between, say -1 and 1, i.e. in the interval (-1,1), then its bounded.

But what if all values of an lies between, say -3 and 1, i.e in the interval (-3,1)? Is it still bounded?

By the above definition it isn't. Essentially what I'm asking is whether the definition can be N ≤ an ≤ M , for some N belonging to real numbers?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ryuzaki said:
But what if all values of an lies between, say -3 and 1, i.e in the interval (-3,1)? Is it still bounded?

If all the values lie in the interval (-3,1) then they also lie in the interval (-3,3).
 

Related to Bounded Sequence: Thomas-Finney Definition Explained

1. What is a bounded sequence according to the Thomas-Finney definition?

A bounded sequence, according to the Thomas-Finney definition, is a sequence of real numbers where there exists a finite number M such that the absolute value of every term in the sequence is less than or equal to M. In other words, the sequence is "bounded" by a finite number.

2. How is the boundedness of a sequence determined using the Thomas-Finney definition?

The boundedness of a sequence is determined by finding the absolute value of each term in the sequence and comparing it to a finite number M. If all the absolute values are less than or equal to M, then the sequence is bounded. If there is no finite M that satisfies this condition, then the sequence is unbounded.

3. Can a sequence be both bounded and unbounded according to the Thomas-Finney definition?

No, a sequence cannot be both bounded and unbounded according to the Thomas-Finney definition. This is because the definition states that a bounded sequence must have an upper and lower bound (M and -M), while an unbounded sequence does not have these bounds.

4. How is the Thomas-Finney definition of a bounded sequence different from other definitions?

The Thomas-Finney definition of a bounded sequence is different from other definitions because it specifically states that the sequence must have an upper and lower bound, while other definitions may only require one of these bounds. Additionally, the Thomas-Finney definition uses the concept of absolute value to determine boundedness, while other definitions may use other methods.

5. Why is the Thomas-Finney definition of a bounded sequence important in mathematics?

The Thomas-Finney definition of a bounded sequence is important in mathematics because it provides a clear and concise definition of what it means for a sequence to be bounded. This definition allows mathematicians to accurately determine whether a sequence is bounded or not, which is crucial in many mathematical proofs and applications.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
571
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
928
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top