Application of Burnside's Lemma

In summary, Burnside's lemma tells us that if G is a finite group that acts on X, then|X/G|=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g\in G}{|X^g|}Where X/G is the number of orbits of G, and Xg is the elements fixed by G.Now, we put X the set of all coloured triangles. Dih(3) acts on this. Two triangles are the same under rotation and reflection if and only if they are in the same orbit. So we need to count X/G.So, we need to count Xg for each g. In total, there are
  • #1
Jay121
3
0
Struggling to apply Burnside's Lemma to an example for the Dihedral group (3)

i.e

We colour the vertices of an equilateral triangle with three colours: red, blue, green.
We do not distinguish colourings if they can be obtained from each other by rotations
or reflections. Use Burnside’s Lemma to count the colourings.

Any help would be great (particularly on how to identify fixed points!)

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So, Burnside's lemma tells us that if G is a finite group that acts on X, then

[tex]|X/G|=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g\in G}{|X^g|}[/tex]

Where X/G is the number of orbits of G, and Xg is the elements fixed by G.

Now, we put X the set of all coloured triangles. Dih(3) acts on this. Two triangles are the same under rotation and reflection if and only if they are in the same orbit. So we need to count X/G.

So, we need to count Xg for each g. In total, there are 33 number of triangles.
  • There are 33 triangles fixed by the identity.
  • There are 32 triangles fixed under reflection, and there are 3 reflections
  • There are 3 triangles fixed under rotation, and there are 2 rotations.

Thus

[tex]|X/G|=\frac{1}{6}(3^3+3^2+2.3)[/tex]
 
  • #3
Do you mean

[tex]
|X/G|=\frac{1}{6}(3^3+3.3^2+2.3)
[/tex]

As there are 3 reflections?

Thanks for this its helped a lot :)
 
  • #4
Yes, that's what I meant :smile:
 
  • #5
Found a trickier one =\

We colour the vertices of a regular hexagon with two different colours. We do not distinguish colourings if they can be obtained from each other by rotations or reflections. Use Burnside's Lemma to count the colourings.

So |G|=2^6=64

Any help on how I go about identifying the rotations and reflections? I know that D(6) acts on this so we have 6 rotations and 6 reflections

I think my main issue with these problems is actually defining what is meant by a fixed point in this situation

Cheers
 
  • #6
Draw a hexagon. Can you identify all the rotations and reflections in the hexagon? Turning the hexagon clockwise gives you rotations. The reflections can be described by picking two points and use that as reflection axis.

Now, for a certain transformation, a fixed point is simply a vertex that remains in the same spot before and after the transformation...

If you really understood the triangle example, then I don't think this should be a problem...
 

Related to Application of Burnside's Lemma

1. What is Burnside's Lemma?

Burnside's Lemma, also known as the Orbit-Counting Lemma, is a mathematical theorem that is used to count the number of distinct combinations or arrangements of objects, taking into account symmetries and group actions.

2. How is Burnside's Lemma applied in real-world scenarios?

Burnside's Lemma has applications in various fields such as chemistry, physics, computer science, and combinatorics. For example, it can be used to count the number of distinct chemical compounds, configurations of physical systems, or arrangements of objects in a game or puzzle.

3. Can Burnside's Lemma be applied to any type of symmetry?

Burnside's Lemma can be applied to any type of symmetry, including rotational, translational, and reflectional symmetries. It can also be applied to combinations of these symmetries.

4. What are the limitations of Burnside's Lemma?

Burnside's Lemma assumes that the group actions being considered are finite and that the objects being arranged or combined are indistinguishable. It also does not take into account restrictions or constraints on the arrangements or combinations.

5. Are there any other theorems similar to Burnside's Lemma?

Yes, there are other theorems that are similar to Burnside's Lemma, such as Polya's Enumeration Theorem and the Cauchy-Frobenius Lemma. These theorems also involve counting objects with symmetries, but may have different assumptions or applications.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • General Math
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Back
Top