- #1
DaveC426913
Gold Member
- 22,530
- 6,192
If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
Not really into sci fi Dave. Some good films here and there.DaveC426913 said:If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
It's a science forum.pinball1970 said:Not really into sci fi Dave. Some good films here and there.
Is this a good site? Discussing films and stuff?
Why would I be into sci fi if like science? Does it follow I like meta physics because I use physics in my job?DaveC426913 said:It's a science forum.
OK, that's a bit of a stretch.
It ... uses the word 'science' a lot.
Or Meta, or Threads... There's a whole new rabbit hole...pinball1970 said:Does it follow I like meta physics because I use physics in my job?
I think I still am. What's up? Pm if you prefer...DaveC426913 said:If so, I'd like to beg a favour.
I changed my contact info, and the auto-confirm is busted so I've been locked out for a week.russ_watters said:I think I still am. What's up? Pm if you prefer...
I am a member there too.DaveC426913 said:I changed my contact info, and the auto-confirm is busted so I've been locked out for a week.
But it looks like the Forumati just returned from vacation to save the day. So all may be well.
Tx .I'll keep you apprised.
Apologies I misread your post. No one actually mentioned sci fi except me!DaveC426913 said:It's a science forum.
OK, that's a bit of a stretch.
It ... uses the word 'science' a lot.
Oh God why...pinball1970 said:Inlik
... joined just to see...
Well that will go up by 33% if I ever get my login working.Ivan Seeking said:I remember when PF and SciForums were running neck and neck. But that was almost 20 years ago. I hadn't looked at SF for a long time and I know it was really bad there the last time I looked. But the place is a morgue now. I logged in and saw 3 members online.
Will I tell James or Bells you are locked out?DaveC426913 said:Well that will go up by 33% if I ever get my login working.
Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ratio on sci.physics.* decades ago?WWGD said:This guy, Archie Plutonium, almost ruined it single-handedly.
Precisely. A potent mix of stupid, nasty and aggressive. Edit:Still today, I keep a dark place in my heart for him.strangerep said:Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ration on sci.physics.* decades ago?
The more things change, the more...
Actually, that would be great.geordief said:Will I tell James or Bells you are locked out?
I was going to reply to James quite soon anyway since he answered my question about Newtonian gravity a short while back.
Curious. I'll check it out in the week.DaveC426913 said:Oh God why...
Ouch, that sounds painful...DaveC426913 said:so he doesn't think I've had a stronk
Also known as Archie-Pu. (pronounced as "poo")strangerep said:Oh, @$#^$%#&^%!. Could that be one Archimedes Plutonium who vastly decreased the signal-to-noise ration on sci.physics.* decades ago?