Anybody else sick of the current math axioms?

In summary, the conversation discusses the frustration with long and tedious proofs in ZFC and the desire for a new kind of mathematics. The website Falso is mentioned as a potential solution, along with the suggestion to split the remaining Millennium problems and prize money. There is also some lighthearted banter about the humor and marketing of this new approach to mathematics. The reliability of the testimonials on the website is also questioned.
  • #1
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
22,183
3,321
Anybody tired of those long, tedious proofs in ZFC?
Anybody tired of those annoying counterexamples to beautiful results?
Want to see a new kind of mathematics where everything works fine?

Try Falso: http://estatis.coders.fm/falso/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Want to split the remaining Millennium problems and prize money? ([tex]60:40 \equiv 50:50[/tex], I can prove it...)
 
  • #3
I find it hard to tell when they are kidding and what they're purpose actually is. Not in a funny way either.

EDIT: Apparently, seeing as the consensus is that it is funny, I just have a bad sense of humor. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #4
April 1st came early this year :smile:

But they should be marketing this to engineers not mathematicians :rolleyes:
 
  • #5
Were those testamonials, by Burnside, Sylvester and Routh got by Ouija board?
 

Related to Anybody else sick of the current math axioms?

1. Why are current math axioms being questioned?

Mathematicians constantly review and update mathematical concepts and principles in order to improve upon existing knowledge and address any inconsistencies or limitations. By questioning current math axioms, scientists can potentially discover new mathematical truths and expand our understanding of the world.

2. What are the potential consequences of changing math axioms?

Changing math axioms can have significant consequences, as it can potentially alter the foundation of mathematical theories and principles. This can lead to a need to re-evaluate and potentially revise previously accepted mathematical equations and solutions.

3. Are there any benefits to questioning math axioms?

Yes, questioning math axioms can lead to advancements in mathematical concepts and the development of new theories and principles. It can also help identify any errors or inconsistencies in current math axioms, leading to a better understanding of mathematical concepts.

4. How do scientists determine if a new math axiom is valid?

Scientists use a rigorous process of logical reasoning and mathematical proof to determine the validity of a new math axiom. This involves testing the new axiom against existing mathematical principles and evaluating its implications and consequences.

5. Are there any examples of past changes to math axioms?

Yes, there have been several changes to math axioms throughout history. One notable example is the development of non-Euclidean geometry, which challenged the long-held Euclidean axioms and led to the discovery of new geometric principles. Another example is the development of complex numbers, which challenged the previously accepted axioms of real numbers and expanded our understanding of mathematical concepts.

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Math
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
447
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
980
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top