Analyzing surfaces and curves using Implicit Function Thm

In summary: That's all there is to it. In summary, the surface S is described as the plane x+y = z and can be found as the locus of the equation F(x, y, z)= x+y- z= 0. The points where \partialuf and \partialvf are linearly dependent can be found by taking the cross product. The singularities of S can be found at points where the partials are not linearly independent. To find a description of the shape, one can solve the three equations in three unknown values, using the given parametric equations.
  • #1
trap101
342
0
for each of the following maps f: ℝ2-->ℝ3, describe the surface S = f(ℝ2) and find a description of S as the locus of an equation F(x,y,z) = 0. Find the points where [itex]\partial[/itex]uf and [itex]\partial[/itex]vf are linearly dependent and describe the singularities of S(if any) at these points

f(u,v) = (2u + v, u-v , 3u) (parametric equation)


Attempt:

So what I do know how to do is determine whether there are points where the partials are linearly dependent, that's done by taking the cross product.

But the initial part is where I'm having problems. In the solutions, they were able to describe this as S is the plane x+y = z. Now from just finishing a few problems between R^1 and R^2, the only way I was mainly able to figure out a description of the shape was through some plugging in and drawing of the graph. Is this what I would have to do for these questions as well? Also what kind of description are they looking for in terms of the locus? and finally when they ask about the singularity of S at a point are they just talking about where the partials are not linearly independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's really just a matter of solving three equations in three unknown values. You are given that x= 2u+ v, y= u- v, and z= 3u. Adding the first two equations eliminates v and gives x+y= 3u so that u= (x+ y)/3. Putting that into z= 3u, z= 3(x+ y)/3= x+ y. That is, z= x+y so F(x, y, z)= x+y- z= 0.
 

Related to Analyzing surfaces and curves using Implicit Function Thm

1. What is the Implicit Function Theorem?

The Implicit Function Theorem is a mathematical tool used to analyze surfaces and curves by finding equations for them based on their implicit relationship with other variables. It allows us to determine the existence and properties of these equations without having to explicitly solve for them.

2. How does the Implicit Function Theorem work?

The theorem states that if a surface or curve can be described by an equation in the form of F(x,y) = 0, then we can find a function y = g(x) that represents the curve or surface by taking the derivative of F with respect to y and solving for y in terms of x. This function will satisfy the original equation and allow us to analyze the surface or curve more easily.

3. What are some applications of the Implicit Function Theorem?

The theorem has many applications in fields such as physics, engineering, and economics. It can be used to determine the behavior of systems and to solve optimization problems. It is also used in computer graphics to create 3D models and in robotics to control movement and navigation.

4. What are the limitations of the Implicit Function Theorem?

The theorem can only be applied to certain types of equations, such as those that are differentiable and have continuous partial derivatives. It also assumes that the function in question has a single-valued inverse, which may not always be the case. Additionally, the theorem does not provide a method for explicitly finding the equation of the surface or curve, and may only give a local representation rather than a global one.

5. How is the Implicit Function Theorem related to the Inverse Function Theorem?

The Implicit Function Theorem is a special case of the Inverse Function Theorem, which states that if a function is invertible and its derivative is non-zero, then an inverse function can be found. The Implicit Function Theorem applies this concept to surfaces and curves, where the function is not explicitly given and must be found using the derivative of the implicit equation.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
530
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
670
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
842
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
658
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top