Americans involved in UN Food for oil scandal

  • News
  • Thread starter kat
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Food Oil
In summary, the CIA deleted from Duelfer's report names of Saddam's U.S. oil-for-food favorites. But an uncensored copy of the Duelfer report obtained by NEWSWEEK indicates Houston oil mogul Oscar Wyatt got oil allocations from Saddam which could have earned him and Coastal Corp.—a company he founded and ran until 2000—profits of more than $22 million. Wyatt and wife Lynn are major donors to political causes: since 1989 they have given nearly $700,000 in contributions, of which more than $500,000 went to Democrats. Wyatt told NEWSWEEK that his company did buy oil from Saddam but that he never did so personally, and that his company's dealings all complied with U.N. rules
  • #1
kat
42
0
I've been waiting for this to begin to leak.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6214647/site/newsweek/
Law-enforcement sources say Americans who participated in alleged oil-for-food scams also may face further investigation. The CIA deleted from Duelfer's report names of Saddam's U.S. oil-for-food favorites. But an uncensored copy of the Duelfer report obtained by NEWSWEEK indicates Houston oil mogul Oscar Wyatt got oil allocations from Saddam which could have earned him and Coastal Corp.—a company he founded and ran until 2000—profits of more than $22 million. Wyatt and wife Lynn are major donors to political causes: since 1989 they have given nearly $700,000 in contributions, of which more than $500,000 went to Democrats. Wyatt told NEWSWEEK that his company did buy oil from Saddam but that he never did so personally, and that his company's dealings all complied with U.N. rules.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
One thing that is "surprisingly" overlooked in this case is: where did the oil go? Answer: the US was the biggest importer of the Iraqi oil, all the way through from end '96 until.. now. Strange isn't it?
 
  • #3
Well, a lot of oil going to the U.S. in and of itself would not be a problem...if purchased legitimately.
 
  • #4
Mercator said:
One thing that is "surprisingly" overlooked in this case is: where did the oil go? Answer: the US was the biggest importer of the Iraqi oil, all the way through from end '96 until.. now. Strange isn't it?


Yeah, that was the idea of the program, that the oil was being purchased. The question was, how was it being purchased?
 
  • #5
I think You're in for a surprise when the true scope of this scandal surfaces:
Of the billions allegedly siphoned off, $5.7 billion was from smuggling oil through neighboring countries, such as US allies Jordan and Turkey. While this clearly broke sanctions, the United States never pressed those countries to stop it, although it did get annoyed when Syria belatedly made up its differences with Iraq and joined in the trade. The other $4.4 billion was the result of kickbacks from imports and surcharges on oil contracts. The Security Council, on which the United States has a veto, had allowed the Iraqis to negotiate their own contracts,... http://www.una-uk.org/iraq/oilforfood.html
 
  • #6
Another observation: American food for oil, Yes. But all the way through, while the UN was already accused of the misdoings? And look at 2003: all the way through, before, during and after the invasion the US was virtually the only country importing Iraqi crude? And why is it an AMERICAN branch of a French bank allegedly involved in this? To do illegal deals via the US with France? Looks like this UN bashing is going to backfire seriously. I am in the energy industry and it is a public secret that the US has always been the most active in dirty oil deals with Iraq.
 
  • #7
So, do you start to understand why this investigation takes so long and has only really got attention AFTER the Bush re-election? All this BS about the UN and France, while it is actually the Americans controlling the UN and keeping a lid on the dirtbin?
 

Related to Americans involved in UN Food for oil scandal

1. What is the UN Food for oil scandal?

The UN Food for oil scandal was a corruption scandal that occurred in the early 2000s involving the United Nations' Oil-for-Food program. The program aimed to provide humanitarian aid to the people of Iraq who were suffering under the economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations in the aftermath of the Gulf War. However, it was discovered that the program was used to illegally generate billions of dollars in revenue for Saddam Hussein's regime through oil smuggling and kickbacks.

2. How were Americans involved in the scandal?

Americans were involved in the scandal in various ways. Some American companies, such as Bayoil, were found to have illegally purchased Iraqi oil and made illegal payments to the Iraqi government during the program. Additionally, some American politicians and individuals were accused of receiving kickbacks from the Iraqi government in exchange for their support of the program and lifting of sanctions.

3. What were the consequences of the scandal?

The scandal led to various consequences, including the resignation of the UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's son, Kojo Annan, who was involved in a company that received oil vouchers from the Iraqi government. It also damaged the reputation of the United Nations and resulted in various investigations and trials of individuals and companies involved in the scandal.

4. Were all Americans involved in the scandal found guilty?

No, not all Americans involved in the scandal were found guilty. Some individuals and companies were acquitted of charges, while others reached settlements with the US government. However, several individuals and companies were convicted and faced penalties, including prison sentences and fines.

5. Has the UN taken steps to prevent similar scandals from happening in the future?

Yes, the UN has taken steps to prevent similar scandals from happening in the future. The Independent Inquiry Committee, established by the UN in 2004, recommended various reforms to improve transparency and accountability in the organization's operations. Additionally, the UN has implemented stricter procurement and financial regulations and established an Ethics Office to oversee ethical standards within the organization.

Similar threads

Replies
77
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Back
Top