Additional Group Theory Issues

In summary, the conversation involves two separate questions. The first question asks to prove that a certain set is closed with respect to a given operation. The second question asks to prove that two groups are isomorphic. The conversation includes discussions on the definitions and properties of closure and isomorphism, as well as steps to approach and solve the questions. In order to prove closure, one must show that the operation on two elements from the given set results in an element within the set. To prove isomorphism, one must define a function that maps one group onto the other, and show that it is one-to-one, onto, and operation preserving.
  • #1
ZTV
5
0
I really don't get this group theory stuff at all. These should be simple questions, but alas not...

Homework Statement



Assume that * is an associative operation on S and that a is an element of S.

Let C(a) = {x: x is an element of S and a*x = x*a}

Prove that C(a) is closed with respect to *

Homework Equations



Unsure

The Attempt at a Solution



To be perfectly honest, I don't understand the notation or anything. I have no clue where to start. I know that to prove closure I have to show that when g, h are elements of G that g*h is also an element of G. Does this mean I have to show that a*x is an element of S?

~~~~

Homework Statement



Prove that Aut(Z3) is isomorphic to Z2 [Z3 and Z2 the group of modulo classes, eg. Z3: { [0][1][2]}

Homework Equations



Once I've found Aut(Z3) which I think I've done, I need to show that Aut(Z3) is one-to-one, onto and operation preserving (homorphic)

I found Aut(Z3) to be {[0][1][2] , [0][2][1]}

The Attempt at a Solution



With Aut(Z3) = {[0][1][2] , [0][2][1]}
and
Z2 = {[0][1]}

I can see how they are supposed to be isomorphic already.

I consider f: {Aut(Z3)) -> Z2}

I'm thinking that showing that they are one-to-one and onto may be trivial, but I'm not sure.

I also looked at f ([0][1][2]) = f ([0][2][1]) and proving [0]=[1] for one-to-one but this doesn't make sense because [0]=/=[1] ... hmmm... perhaps I'm being silly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For the first question take two elements of the C(a), say x and y, and show that x*y is in C(a), i.e. (x*y)*a=a*(x*y)

Second question, you need to find the Automorphisms on Z3 which you have. Aut is a group under composition. Label the two automorphisms you have and make an isomorphism (which is pretty obvious) to Z2. The problem you are having is that you got the wrong impression what Aut is. It is a set of functions, so Aut(Z3) = {[0][1][2] , [0][2][1]} is not true. It consists of two functions, one of which is the identity, and the other one swaps [1] and [2].
 
  • #3
ZTV said:
I really don't get this group theory stuff at all. These should be simple questions, but alas not...

Homework Statement



Assume that * is an associative operation on S and that a is an element of S.

Let C(a) = {x: x is an element of S and a*x = x*a}

Prove that C(a) is closed with respect to *

Homework Equations



Unsure

The Attempt at a Solution



To be perfectly honest, I don't understand the notation or anything. I have no clue where to start. I know that to prove closure I have to show that when g, h are elements of G that g*h is also an element of G. Does this mean I have to show that a*x is an element of S?

~~~~
You are asked to prove that C(S) is closed with respect to *. That means "if a and b are both in C(S) then a*b is in C(S)". And, of course, you need to use the definition of C(S). If a and b are such that a*x= x*a and b*x= x*b for all x in S, what can you say about (a*b)*x and x*(b*a)? (Note that a*x and x*b are also in S. Do you know why?)

Homework Statement



Prove that Aut(Z3) is isomorphic to Z2 [Z3 and Z2 the group of modulo classes, eg. Z3: { [0][1][2]}

Homework Equations



Once I've found Aut(Z3) which I think I've done, I need to show that Aut(Z3) is one-to-one, onto and operation preserving (homorphic)

I found Aut(Z3) to be {[0][1][2] , [0][2][1]}
Am I to assume that "[0][1][2]" is the automorphism that maps 0 to 0, 1 to 1 and 2 to 2 while "[0][2][1]" is the automorphis that maps 0 to 0, 1 to 2, and 2 to 1?

The Attempt at a Solution



With Aut(Z3) = {[0][1][2] , [0][2][1]}
and
Z2 = {[0][1]}

I can see how they are supposed to be isomorphic already.

I consider f: {Aut(Z3)) -> Z2}

I'm thinking that showing that they are one-to-one and onto may be trivial, but I'm not sure.

I also looked at f ([0][1][2]) = f ([0][2][1]) and proving [0]=[1] for one-to-one but this doesn't make sense because [0]=/=[1] ... hmmm... perhaps I'm being silly.
Yes, that last statement is not true. One of the things you should have learned about "isomorphisms" is that an isomorphism always maps "identity" to "identity". [0][1][2] is obviously the identity function in Aut(Z3) so it must be mapped to the identity of Z2. There is only one other element left in Aut(Z3) and one left in Z2! You should be able to write down the only possible isomorphism from Aut(Z3) to Z2.
 
  • #4
So what are the elements of Aut(Z3) then?

Functions f that map Z3->Z3 such that fZ3 = Z3 ?

If this is the case...

I now have aut(Z3) = {fa fb} and Z2 = {[0][1]}

I'm trying to show that they are homomorpic/operation preserving.

I have to define a function y that maps
y: Aut(Z3) -> Z2 is this correct? If so, how do I show it is operation preserving?

Once I have that it is homomorphc, the fact that it is one-to-one and onto is trivial because fa -> [0] if it is homomorphic, so fb must go to [1] hence one-to-one and onto. Is this correct also?

Thanks
 
  • #5
ZTV said:
So what are the elements of Aut(Z3) then?

Functions f that map Z3->Z3 such that fZ3 = Z3 ?

If this is the case...

I now have aut(Z3) = {fa fb} and Z2 = {[0][1]}

I'm trying to show that they are homomorpic/operation preserving.

I have to define a function y that maps
y: Aut(Z3) -> Z2 is this correct? If so, how do I show it is operation preserving?

Once I have that it is homomorphc, the fact that it is one-to-one and onto is trivial because fa -> [0] if it is homomorphic, so fb must go to [1] hence one-to-one and onto. Is this correct also?

Thanks

Yes, mind you fa is the identity map. If you have shown it to be a homomorphism then it preserves the operation (which is what homomorphisms are). The bijection is clear, homomorphism shouldn't be too hard to prove.

As a general rule of thumb you want to specify how y maps, its the map as you said that takes fa to [0] and fb to [1].

Think of homomorphism as structure preserving, if f is a homomorphism then f(ab)=f(a)f(b), so they practically have the same operation. Isomorphism tells you that you just essentially relabeled your elements, because it is bijective and operation preserving.
 

Related to Additional Group Theory Issues

1. What is the purpose of studying additional group theory issues?

Additional group theory issues refer to topics and concepts that go beyond the fundamental principles of group theory. These issues are often studied to understand more complex systems and phenomena, such as symmetry in molecules and crystals, electronic band structures in solids, and phase transitions in materials. Studying additional group theory issues allows scientists to better understand and predict the behavior of these systems.

2. What are some common examples of additional group theory issues?

Some common examples of additional group theory issues include point groups, space groups, irreducible representations, and character tables. These concepts are used to classify and describe the symmetries present in various systems and materials. They are also important in predicting the properties and behavior of these systems.

3. How does group theory relate to other branches of science?

Group theory has applications in many other branches of science, including chemistry, physics, biology, and materials science. In chemistry, group theory is used to predict the geometry and electronic structure of molecules. In physics, it is used to describe the symmetries of particles and the behavior of quantum systems. In biology, it is used to understand the symmetry and structure of biomolecules. In materials science, group theory is used to study the symmetry and properties of crystalline materials.

4. What are some challenges in studying additional group theory issues?

One of the main challenges in studying additional group theory issues is the complexity of the mathematical concepts involved. Many of these issues require a strong understanding of abstract algebra and linear algebra. Additionally, the application of group theory to real-world systems can be challenging, as it often involves simplifying assumptions and approximations.

5. How can the study of additional group theory issues benefit society?

The study of additional group theory issues can lead to a better understanding of the underlying principles and symmetries in nature. This knowledge can then be applied to develop new materials, technologies, and medicines. For example, understanding the symmetry of molecules can aid in the development of new drugs, while understanding the symmetry of crystals can lead to the creation of stronger and more efficient materials for various applications.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
362
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top