- #1
trap101
- 342
- 0
I have two more loosely based questions about PDEs and the separation of variables technique:
In the intro of this chapter the author imposed that we "assume" the the solution to a set of special PDEs is:
U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) where X and T are the eigenfunctions. My question is how did they derive that this form would work? I mean working from that equation you see it works, but how did they even conjure up the direction in which to go to arrive at that? This is my first PDE course so maybe that is above my pay grade and I should worry about that after.
The second question was how do I know that separation of variables is the right technique to use when solving a question, if I have other techniques to use?
Thanks
In the intro of this chapter the author imposed that we "assume" the the solution to a set of special PDEs is:
U(x,t) = X(x)T(t) where X and T are the eigenfunctions. My question is how did they derive that this form would work? I mean working from that equation you see it works, but how did they even conjure up the direction in which to go to arrive at that? This is my first PDE course so maybe that is above my pay grade and I should worry about that after.
The second question was how do I know that separation of variables is the right technique to use when solving a question, if I have other techniques to use?
Thanks