A multiple-impact origin for the Moon

  • I
  • Thread starter Buzz Bloom
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Moon Origin
In summary, the article cited discusses the theories surrounding the formation of the moon and provides a video showing the current and proposed theories. The author expresses interest in reading the entire paper and questions the improbability argument and the time frame for the merger of moons. They also mention the relevance of an additional article discussing the age of the moon. In the end, the author suggests using Occam's razor to consider the most plausible theory.
  • #1
Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
2,519
467
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
This article about the paper goes into a bit more detail and provides a video showing the current and proposed theories. See also this phys.org article.

I would like to see the entire paper. I don't understand the improbability argument. If it happened, it happened, regardless of how improbable it is. The angular momentum argument might be more persuasive but the merger of moons to form the present moon would have to have occurred while the moons were in a fluid state. The time frame for this merger due to outward creep of the moonlets must be fairly long.

AM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
  • #4
Given the choice between multiple theories, Occam's razor is an appealing discriminator. The giant impactor theory is fairly compelling on those grounds. Fewer loose ends are ordinarily favored absent conficting evidence and I don't see any such that is particularly compelling.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU

Related to A multiple-impact origin for the Moon

1. What is a multiple-impact origin for the Moon?

A multiple-impact origin for the Moon is a theory that suggests the Moon was formed from several large impacts between the Earth and other celestial bodies during the early stages of the solar system's formation.

2. How does this theory differ from the commonly accepted single-impact origin for the Moon?

The single-impact origin theory, also known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis, proposes that the Moon was formed from a single impact between a Mars-sized object and the early Earth. The multiple-impact theory suggests that the Moon was formed from multiple impacts, rather than a single one.

3. What evidence supports the multiple-impact origin theory?

Scientists have found evidence of multiple large impacts on the Moon's surface, including variations in the composition of lunar rocks and the presence of different types of craters. Additionally, computer simulations have shown that multiple impacts could have created the Moon's current size and orbit.

4. What are the implications of a multiple-impact origin for the Moon?

If the multiple-impact theory is true, it would change our understanding of the early solar system and the processes involved in the formation of planets and moons. It could also have implications for our understanding of Earth's evolution and the potential for life to develop on other planets.

5. Is the multiple-impact origin theory widely accepted among scientists?

The multiple-impact origin theory is still a subject of debate and ongoing research among scientists. While it has gained some support in recent years, the single-impact origin theory is still the most widely accepted explanation for the Moon's formation.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
895
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top