Recent content by Alexis1304

I also had gut feeling that it is not...

My question is: ok,Everett's interpretation is considered controversial among physicists,but - prevailing among people who engage in Quantum Cocmology/Quantum Computing,according to Deutsch/Lockwood(1994).My question is - is it really true that Everett has no alternatives in Quantum...

Yes,I understand that,my question is specific about Everett regarding Quantum Cosmology and Computation

Hello All, I've just recently read David Deutsch and Michael Lockwood article about Time Travel of 1994 in Scientific American.They stated,that although among the physicists Everett's theory remains controversial,it has no alternatives in Quantum Cosmology and Quantum Computing.Is it really...

Thanks,Heinera

Hello all, On Cosmology webstie I found the article about Time Travel,Uncertainty Principle and Many Worlds. Here is the quote: "DeWitt’s many-worlds interpretation of Everett’s work, posits that there may be a split in the combined observer–object system, the observation causing the splitting...

Thanks,bapowell.I paid attention that the news about it didn't come from solid newspapers.An my second link also deals with Plank data but is of opposite conclusions

Hi guys, On Wikipedia I found this article: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/planck-univ...-holman-468831 The map showed anomalies that cosmologists believe could only have been caused by the gravitational pull of other universes outside our own. "These anomalies were caused by other universes...

Hi Fredrik, thanks for the reply, Well,as I told I got that - "branching is natural thanks to decoherence- ironically in the article that overall is critical to mwi, but starts why mwi is attractive- "Nothing happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation' was already discussed here...

Not sure this is good analogy,though.As I learned, branching is natural thanks to decoherence.It just may mean differnt things,perhaps

Thanks, folks Another question arises I think this article "Nothing happens in the Universe of the Everett Interpretation' was already discussed here http://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.8447v1.pdf The article itself is critical towards MWI, but starts that "why MWI is attractive" and mentions that...

So, You mean that "electron being in 2 places at one" DOESN'T nescesseraly mean "universe splitted" and other interpretations of that are available?

Hi,thanks for the reply. Have You read the article by Kaku that I linke in one of my previous posts? He analyzes the work of Nobel Laureats, but I think his mention of "electron in 2 positions" was well known before this work of Wineland and Haroche. He also says that until now this...

Hi Bill, What exactly is controversial? I think "electron at 2 positions at the same time" is known fact in Quantum Mechanics,the question is what it means? For Kaku and some others it means the universe "splitted" but as I understand there is no consensus about it. And the work of these Nobel...

M.Kaku Folks, have alook how M.Kaku commented on Nobel Prize 2012, and how he talks about "electron been at 2 places" .He says "it means the universe has splitted": http://bigthink.com/dr-kakus-universe/nobel-prize-awarded-to-two-quantum-physicists Is electron at 2 places a "double...