- #1
RyderP
- 37
- 0
I think I figured out Sloot encryption, and am thinking of designing a ternary, volumetric version. Any thoughts?
Actually, Sloot encryption was a real-life system, said to be able to convert a three-hour movie into a file size of eight kilobytes of data - and, this was back in the '80's and '90's.Greg Bernhardt said:What science fiction is this from?
Ternary sloot encryption is a type of encryption that uses three symbols instead of two, making it more complex and difficult to crack. Instead of using just 0's and 1's, ternary sloot encryption uses 0's, 1's, and 2's to represent data.
The volumetric approach involves analyzing the three-dimensional structure of the encrypted data to find patterns and relationships between the symbols. This can provide clues and insights into the encryption method used, making it easier to decrypt the data.
Yes, ternary sloot encryption is considered to be more secure because it uses three symbols instead of two, making it harder to crack. However, the security also depends on the specific encryption algorithm used.
Ternary sloot encryption can be used in any situation where sensitive data needs to be protected, such as in online banking, secure messaging, and government communications. It can also be used to secure data in storage or during transmission.
Yes, there are some limitations to the volumetric approach. It may not be as effective if the encryption algorithm used is highly complex and random. It also requires significant computing power and resources to analyze the volumetric data, making it a time-consuming process.