- #5,286
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,498
- 9,824
Because it's there !BillTre said:No one knows why.
And marine mammals are protected from harassment in California, so you can't easily take your board back (so I hear).BillTre said:There is a sea otter that steals surfboards and rides them in Santa Cruz.
View attachment 329220
No one knows why.
She was raised in captivity and released back into the wild so she probably has no fear of humans. And why surfboards? Maybe she got tired of body surfing. :) Or maybe she just wants a nice place to lie in the sun and knows she can chase off humans.BillTre said:There is a sea otter that steals surfboards and rides them in Santa Cruz.
View attachment 329220
No one knows why.
I'd guess what he had in mind is that the AI company is selling my data. But as I recall I didn't register.collinsmark said:Well, @Hornbein might have a point here.
It goes without saying that AI is in its infancy, and that's certainly true in legal realms.
But there have been some early signs (and again, everything involving AI is "early" at this point in time) that AI generated works will not be afforded the same copyright protections as other works.
Here is an article as an example: US Copyright Office: AI Generated Works Are Not Eligible for Copyright.
So what does this mean? If an image is generated by AI (not just "AI sharpened," but wholly created such as diffusion based methods discussed in several PF threads), and you get ahold of such an image, you might be able do what you will with it and nobody's really going to stop you. At least in the US.
On the other hand, if your computer wholly generates an AI image, and some marketing department you've never heard of gets their hands on it and decides, without asking, to plaster that image on their cereal boxes, there's not much that you can do about it either.
Here's an article that's a little more recent: New US copyright rules protect only AI art with ‘human authorship’
So maybe it's kinda free? I speculate that rules and rights will become much less ambiguous in the coming years.
I was thinking more along the line that it cost something to produce. Someone has to pay somehow.collinsmark said:So maybe it's kinda free?
DaveE said:And marine mammals are protected from harassment in California, so you can't easily take your board back (so I hear).
We have an old (cold war era) joke about thatBillTre said:I like the word. Its almost autocad.
Reminded me of this songIvan Seeking said:TIL that Willie Nelson and the President's son smoked a joint on the roof of the White House back when Carter was President. Carter confirmed it.
https://consequence.net/2020/09/jimmy-carter-willie-nelson-weed-white-house/
Too funny!!! Long story but when I was much younger, my uncle had virtually unlimited access to the busses of many celebrities for weeks or months at a time. On one occasion my family took Willie's bus for a um....1000 mile test drive for a week. Sure enough, we found a weed tray under one of the bed mattresses.
Ivan Seeking said:Reminded me of this songIvan Seeking said:TIL that Willie Nelson and the President's son smoked a joint on the roof of the White House back when Carter was President. Carter confirmed it.
https://consequence.net/2020/09/jimmy-carter-willie-nelson-weed-white-house/
Too funny!!! Long story but when I was much younger, my uncle had virtually unlimited access to the busses of many celebrities for weeks or months at a time. On one occasion my family took Willie's bus for a um....1000 mile test drive for a week. Sure enough, we found a weed tray under one of the bed mattresses.
LOL! Yes, when I looked back at the thread. The thing about Willie smoking weed at the WH reminded me of the entire business. If he had left some of his weed in that tray I may have had more to tell.jack action said:Let me try to understand this: Something you wrote 4 days earlier reminded you of something else?
The accumulation and bursting of carbon dioxide bubbles can cause a peanut in a glass of beer to repeatedly float and sink. The process may help in understanding phenomena in Earth’s magmas. |
In a highly carbonated beer, such as a craft beer, the peanuts stay bobbing at the surface for longer than they do in a less carbonated beer, such as the lager they used for their experiments.
One might hope that they mutually swore to refrain from the environmentally destructive practice of sowing the Earth with salt. Elephants would of course be banned as weapons of war. Will there be inspections to verify compliance?Frabjous said:TIL that a formal peace treaty was signed by the mayors of Rome and the modern city of Carthage on 5 February 1985; 2,131 years after the 3rd Punic War ended.
https://cherwell.org/2016/02/05/lessons-from-history-the-end-of-the-third-punic-war-1985/
https://www.iflscience.com/man-lands-helicopter-engine-settle-debate-degrasse-tyson-35373 said:[...] they go on to demonstrate how to safely land a helicopter when its motor has failed using a technique called “autorotation.” Using this technique, Gerry Friesen [...] even believes landing a failed helicopter is safer than landing an airplane with a busted engine.
[...]
As Destin explains in the video: "If the rotor blade quits turning you are going to fall like a brick – but helicopter pilots have a physics trick to keep that from happening." All it requires is a simple lever and a hell of a lot of practice. Check it out for yourself in the video below.
The Dutch East Indies company grew fabulously wealthy selling nutmeg as a quack cure for the plague. The tree grew only on three islands in the Moluccas. Nutmeg traveled well and could not be counterfeitedBillTre said:I like curry and I found an article in Science Advances on its early history about 2,000 years ago.
It has an interesting map of ancient spice availability:
View attachment 329500
How is the US military sending "highly sensitive" information without encrypting it first? That would be the real mistake.Hornbein said:TIL that the US military keeps accidentally sending highly sensitive information to email addresses in Mali because they write “.ml” instead of “.mil.” The Dutch company managing Mali’s domain has collected 117,000 emails this year alone.
True. Horny didn't say they could *read* it...jack action said:How is the US military sending "highly sensitive" information without encrypting it first? That would be the real mistake.
Yep. Turning physics from a cold hearted sonofabitch into a temporary ally.jack action said:TIL about an helicopter technique: autorotation.
It is doubtful that the sending mail servers in the U.S. would be running mandatory TLS to a random domain such as .ml. I've been out of the business for over a decade, but last I knew, mandatory TLS was only for designated targets that you know can handle it and should never not do so.jack action said:How is the US military sending "highly sensitive" information without encrypting it first? That would be the real mistake.
Yes, that one.jbriggs444 said:Possibly you are talking about end to end security between cooperating user agents. Like PGP