Relativistic speeds - what do astronauts actually see?

In summary: some...blue shift involved, yes. But I'm not sure how much.The relativistic effects of near-c velocities are incredibly psychedelic & confuddling! o0) But I want to learn more! :biggrin:
  • #1
kiplunk
2
0
Hi! I'm trying to wrap my head around the idea of a spaceship - [let's just say it is "fusion-powered" very very efficiently :wink:] - under constant thrust, accelerating towards a distant star.

It accelerates for the first half of the journey, then cuts its engines & turns around 180-degrees and then begins deceleration for the remaining half of the journey.

What would the astronaut(s) see out the ports?

My bit of googling tells me that relativistic effects kick in about one-tenth c, with some chromatic aberration and distortion. The surrounding starscape begins compressing in the direction of travel as angular separation shrinks. There is increasing doppler shifting ahead, while astern a kind of optical "black hole" begins forming, slowly wrapping around the sides of the vessel, until (as one gets close to c) the field of view shrinks to a dot directly ahead. At 0.99c almost all visible radiation from the universe is confined to a region 10 degrees in radius around the direction of travel.

But then, at the midpoint of travel, the engines cut off. There is no more acceleration & the astronaut(s) are in a state of freefall as the spaceship turns around.

What happens when the engines cut off here? Does the relativistic view outside the windows disappear? Or stay the same?

And what happens when the engines kick in again for decelation? Does the whole relativistic display reverse?

I hope this isn't too weird a question. It's a major part of a story I am writing (the astronaut's first-hand experience of relativistic accelerations etc).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
kiplunk said:
But then, at the midpoint of travel, the engines cut off. There is no more acceleration & the astronaut(s) are in a state of freefall as the spaceship turns around.

What happens when the engines cut off here? Does the relativistic view outside the windows disappear? Or stay the same?

And what happens when the engines kick in again for decelation? Does the whole relativistic display reverse?

I hope this isn't too weird a question. It's a major part of a story I am writing (the astronaut's first-hand experience of relativistic accelerations etc).

These effects, which I think you've got a good idea of, are dependent only on the speed of the ship relative to the stars. They are not due at all to the acceleration, except that it's the acceleration that causes the relative velocity.

As the ship decelerates, the whole process will be undone in reverse and gradually the view of the stars will return to "normal".

Nothing happens when the ship turns 180 degrees, except of course that the front and rear of the ship are reversed.
 
  • #3
kiplunk said:
It accelerates for the first half of the journey, then cuts its engines & turns around 180-degrees and then begins deceleration for the remaining half of the journey.

What would the astronaut(s) see out the ports?
I simulated a similar idea a few years back, here are the videos I made. The scenario covers first receding then approaching, with two values of constant magnitude acceleration. There are also some side views.

Oh, there are also clocks aplenty!

Read the explanatory text. It is terse, but I can answer questions on it here if you need.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
This is exactly what I was after, so thank you, both of you! (Yes, PeroK, I was over-thinking the "acceleration" part! Thank you for putting me straight! )

Excellent animations, m4r35n357! They raise a number of issues for me, however. Not sure if I should make another thread or...?

Well, for one, I am assuming the spaceship's "viewport" is facing backwards, towards the octahedral space station it originated from? In this case (from what I have read), shouldn't there be a growing circular "blind spot" directly astern, growing larger the faster the spaceship travels? I get the impression (from my meagre "research") that the field-of-view shrinks/compresses in the forward direction of travel, leaving (for all intents & purposes) a "black hole" forming directly astern, which creeps up around the spaceship, compressing all radiation into a point directly ahead. I imagine that if the spaceship could achieve near-c (eg 0.999...c), all the radiations of the universe would compress into a single almost infinitely-blue-shifted photon directly ahead? with everything else around this "compressed cosmic photon" basically "outside our world/light-cone"?

The relativistic effects of near-c velocities are incredibly psychedelic & confuddling! o0) But I want to learn more! :biggrin:

Thank you for bearing with me!
 
  • #5
kiplunk said:
I get the impression (from my meagre "research") that the field-of-view shrinks/compresses in the forward direction of travel, leaving (for all intents & purposes) a "black hole" forming directly astern, which creeps up around the spaceship, compressing all radiation into a point directly ahead. I imagine that if the spaceship could achieve near-c (eg 0.999...c), all the radiations of the universe would compress into a single almost infinitely-blue-shifted photon directly ahead? with everything else around this "compressed cosmic photon" basically "outside our world/light-cone"?
There is no hole, black or otherwise! The rear view is "stretched" (so appears closer), dimmed and red-shifted. The front view is "funneled" (so appears further away), brightened and blue-shifted.

Without going into too many details, this image gives a correct interpretation of how the view of a scene changes from front to rear at high relative velocity.
 

Related to Relativistic speeds - what do astronauts actually see?

1. What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity is a fundamental principle in physics that explains how the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion. It consists of two main theories: special relativity and general relativity.

2. How do relativistic speeds affect the perception of time?

According to special relativity, time appears to slow down for an observer moving at speeds close to the speed of light. This phenomenon is known as time dilation and is a result of the constant speed of light in all reference frames.

3. What is the difference between time dilation and length contraction?

Time dilation refers to the slowing down of time for an observer in motion, while length contraction refers to the shortening of an object's length in the direction of motion. Both are consequences of special relativity and are relative to the observer's perspective.

4. How does relativity impact the perception of space?

According to special relativity, space appears to contract in the direction of motion for an observer moving at relativistic speeds. This means that objects will appear shorter in the direction of motion, and distances will appear shorter as well.

5. What do astronauts actually see when traveling at relativistic speeds?

Astronauts traveling at relativistic speeds would experience time dilation, length contraction, and space contraction. They would also see objects and distances appear distorted and would perceive time passing slower than it actually is. However, these effects are only noticeable at speeds close to the speed of light, which is not currently achievable with our current technology.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
66
Views
5K
Back
Top