- #1
chc_cac
- 3
- 0
is there a better way to chart elements? surely chemicals characteristics don't behave by atomic number
Periodic table of elements is inaccurate
- Thread starter chc_cac
- Start date
In summary, there is a better way to chart elements by looking at their properties rather than just their atomic number. This can be seen in the periodic table where elements in the same column have similar properties and reactivity. Other factors like valence number, electronegativity, and ionization energy also follow a pattern in the periodic table. Understanding valence shells can help in understanding why the periodic table is considered a useful tool for predicting an element's general characteristics.
- #2
IBY
- 106
- 0
Well, instead of looking at the atomic number, you should look at the properties of elements in each column, and you will see similarities in properties. Like first row, other than hydrogen, all of them are metals and highly reactive. You do not want to put a chunk of sodium in water. Reactivity usually decreases in metals as it goes to the right. Also notice how nonmetals are all in the right side except hydrogen. The last row is non reactive. There are other things in the periodic table in which you can predict an element's properties. It is not exact, but there are patterns.
- #3
fedaykin
- 138
- 3
They're organized by their atomic number, therefore the table has a lot of organization of valence number. Elements with the same number in their valence shell often have quite similar properties and reactivity characteristics, ex: sodium and potassium, fluorine and chlorine. It so happens that electronegativity and ionization energy follow a decently organized pattern with the table.
Reading up on valence shells might help you understand why the periodic table is considered so useful and, in general, why atomic number is a very useful predictor of general characteristics.
The following image is from wikipedia.
Reading up on valence shells might help you understand why the periodic table is considered so useful and, in general, why atomic number is a very useful predictor of general characteristics.
The following image is from wikipedia.
Attachments
Related to Periodic table of elements is inaccurate
1. Why is the periodic table of elements considered inaccurate?
The periodic table of elements is considered inaccurate because it is based on atomic mass, which does not always accurately reflect an element's properties. Additionally, new elements have been discovered and added to the table, causing it to be constantly changing and evolving.
2. How has the periodic table evolved over time?
The periodic table has evolved over time as new elements have been discovered and our understanding of atomic structure has improved. It was first created by Dmitri Mendeleev in 1869 and has since been reorganized and expanded to reflect our current knowledge of elements.
3. What are some limitations of the periodic table of elements?
Some limitations of the periodic table of elements include its inability to accurately predict the properties of superheavy elements, as well as its inability to account for isotopes and their varying properties.
4. How do scientists determine the properties of new elements?
Scientists determine the properties of new elements through experiments and observations, often using particle accelerators to create and study the element's behavior. They also use theoretical calculations and comparisons to similar elements to make predictions about its properties.
5. Is there a better alternative to the periodic table of elements?
Currently, the periodic table of elements is the most widely accepted and useful tool for organizing and understanding the properties of elements. However, there are alternative versions, such as the spiral periodic table, that some scientists argue may better represent the relationships between elements. Ultimately, the best alternative may depend on the specific purpose and perspective of the user.
Similar threads
-
Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
Chemistry
-
Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
Electrical Engineering
-
Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
General Discussion
-
Quantum Physics
-
Atomic and Condensed Matter