Is Cold Fusion for real this time?

In summary, the conversation on physicsworld.com discusses a recent cold fusion demonstration in Japan that was deemed successful. However, there is still debate over whether this could be a viable form of energy production or just a novelty. Some participants in the conversation have had personal experiences with attempting to replicate the Fleischmann-Pons experiment, but their results were inconclusive. The debate also touches on the possibility of transmutations occurring in these experiments. Overall, the conversation highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding cold fusion and the need for further research and evidence.
  • #1
SF
http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/05/coldfusion_demonstration_a_suc_1.html

hey, it's physicsworld.com ...so what's up, anyone got some info?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Note that this does not qualify as a scientific reference, but it is a claim of unexplained phenomena. It will be most interesting to see if the experiment can be duplicated.

A recent review of the evidence for cold fusion yielded a majority opinion that there were some anomalies worth investigating, but most likely not anything related to cold fusion.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=425462#post425462
 
  • #3
Japanese Cold Fusion Demonstration "successful"

http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/05/coldfusion_demonstration_a_suc_1.html
I will update you if and when I get any more information about the demonstration (apparently there might be some videos circulating soon). For now, though, you can form your own opinions about the reliability of cold fusion.
Interesting article, with real information. What do you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
I have been in one of those teams that "replicated" Fleischmann-Pons experiment. My boss was even interviewed by local TV. Since then I am pretty reluctant. Then, while I am not a nuclear scientis (closer to nucular, if anything), I have never heard why it CAN'T happen.
 
  • #5
Borek said:
I have been in one of those teams that "replicated" Fleischmann-Pons experiment. My boss was even interviewed by local TV. Since then I am pretty reluctant.
Did you actually measure a neutron flux?

Then, while I am not a nuclear scientis (closer to nucular, if anything), I have never heard why it CAN'T happen.
It is not that it can't happen. It is just that the calculated fusion rate is roughly 60 orders of magnitude lower than what was claimed by F&P.
 
  • #6
I think the debate of whether this is or isn't cold fusion is a bit of a red herring. I think the real question should be whether or not this could prove to be a viable option for energy production or whether these experiments are just novelties.

There have been claims of evidence transmutations occurring in these experiments. If this is the case the argument against this being a nuclear effect is null and void.
 
  • #7
Gokul43201 said:
Did you actually measure a neutron flux?

No. That's why I put "replicated" in quotes. Could be I should put quotes around "experiment" as well. In fact we did nothing worth mentioning - apart from electrolysing heavy water on palladium electrode.

I was working in electrochemistry research lab and we happened to have palladium electrodes at hand, heavy water was brought from the other lab, everything else was just sitting on every bench. Most of the time it was just bubbling slowly. At some moments it was gettingt hot quite fast. No idea what happened. And I am not saying that we have seen cold fusion - I simply don't know what we have seen. Someone from the other lab suggested it was just catalytic oxidation of hydrogen (deuter to be precise). Before we decided to investigate further hype was over. Heavy water down the drain, electrodes to the box, case closed.



 
  • #8
I have to say that the comments in that article are fairly embarrassing for those who attack cold fusion. Someone explains that D-D fusion wouldn't produce neutrons, (which seems clear to me: 2+2 particles = 4 in the helium nucleus.) But then poster after poster ignores this and keeps demanding neutrons, with no counter explanation as to why they wouldn't all be in the helium!
 
  • #9
Algr said:
I have to say that the comments in that article are fairly embarrassing for those who attack cold fusion. Someone explains that D-D fusion wouldn't produce neutrons, (which seems clear to me: 2+2 particles = 4 in the helium nucleus.)
Not true. Most deuterium-deuterium fusion events produce either tritium and a proton or He-3 and a neutron. Additionally, deuterium and tritium react to make He-4 and a neutron, while deuterium and He-3 make He-4 and a proton.
 
  • #10
Gokul43201 said:
Not true. Most deuterium-deuterium fusion events produce either tritium and a proton or He-3 and a neutron. Additionally, deuterium and tritium react to make He-4 and a neutron, while deuterium and He-3 make He-4 and a proton.

Ah, they might have mentioned that. Is there a theoretical reason why a given reaction method couldn't largely favor He-4 over the others? I understand that no one wants free neutrons following them home after work - their absence is very ... convenient.
 
  • #11
As I was just told, He-4 from D fusion is excited and it has to deexcite - in most cases it does so by quickly emiting p+ or n, sometimes by emitting γ (much slower). So that's just the way it is.
 
  • #12
Cold fusion reminds me on why fusion has not been observed within Bose-Eienstein condensate of Rb atoms. The bosons are confined in something like a spherical harmonic oscillator and could almost all of them occupy the groundstate at low temperature. But p+,p+ interaction has to be taken into account as well (Colomb blocking).

I believe that you could force nucleus towards each other by maby some special crystal vibration mode. But the momentum is probably to low to overcome the threshold for a fusion reaction.

In principle its just to calulate some Hartree equation where you treat the nucleus as waves as well. I did onces for a carbon crystal and I found that the nucleus wave was extended around 5% of the crystall lattice distance. The wave function overlap of two nucleus in a confining electron gas, within a nuclear distace volume is probably small as well, if this is a masure of the probablity of having them "at the same place" -> causing nuclear reaction?...
 
  • #13
Creating 'free' mass might be objectionable to some physicists.
 

Related to Is Cold Fusion for real this time?

1. Is cold fusion a legitimate scientific concept?

Yes, cold fusion is a legitimate scientific concept that has been studied and researched by scientists for many decades. It involves the fusion of atoms at relatively low temperatures, as opposed to the extremely high temperatures required for traditional nuclear fusion.

2. Has cold fusion been successfully achieved?

While there have been many claims of successful cold fusion experiments over the years, none have been replicated and verified by the scientific community. The majority of scientists remain skeptical of the concept and its feasibility.

3. What are the potential benefits of cold fusion?

If cold fusion were to be successfully achieved, it could potentially provide a nearly limitless source of clean energy, as it does not produce harmful byproducts like traditional nuclear energy. It could also greatly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.

4. What are the challenges facing cold fusion research?

The main challenge facing cold fusion research is the lack of reproducibility in experiments. Many scientists have been unable to replicate the results of supposed successful experiments, leading to doubts about the validity of the concept. Additionally, the technology and infrastructure needed for cold fusion is still in its early stages and requires significant development.

5. Is there ongoing research in the field of cold fusion?

Yes, there is still ongoing research and experimentation in the field of cold fusion, although it is not as widely funded or supported as traditional nuclear fusion or other alternative energy sources. Some scientists and organizations continue to explore the potential of cold fusion, but it remains a highly controversial and debated topic in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
604
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
844
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
824
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
966
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top