Copenhagen interpretation

The Copenhagen interpretation is a collection of views about the meaning of quantum mechanics principally attributed to Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg. It is one of the oldest of numerous proposed interpretations of quantum mechanics, as features of it date to the development of quantum mechanics during 1925–1927, and it remains one of the most commonly taught.There is no definitive historical statement of what is the Copenhagen interpretation. There are some fundamental agreements and disagreements between the views of Bohr and Heisenberg. For example, Heisenberg emphasized a sharp "cut" between the observer (or the instrument) and the system being observed, while Bohr offered an interpretation that is independent of a subjective observer or measurement or collapse, which relies on an "irreversible" or effectively irreversible process, which could take place within the quantum system.Hans Primas describes nine theses or principles of the Copenhagen interpretation: quantum physics applies to individual objects, not only ensembles of objects; their description is probabilistic; their description is the result of experiments described in terms of classical (non-quantum) physics; the "frontier" that separates the classical from the quantum can be chosen arbitrarily; the act of "observation" or "measurement" is irreversible; the act of "observation" or "measurement" involves an action upon the object measured and reduces the wave packet; complementary properties cannot be observed simultaneously; no truth can be attributed to an object except according to the results of its measurement; and that quantum descriptions are objective, in that they are independent of physicists' mental arbitrariness.Over the years, there have been many objections to aspects of the Copenhagen interpretation, including the discontinuous and stochastic nature of the "observation" or "measurement" process, the apparent subjectivity of requiring an observer, the difficulty of defining what might count as a measuring device, and the seeming reliance upon classical physics in describing such devices.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  • 34

    Greg Bernhardt

    A PF Singularity From USA
    • Messages
      19,447
    • Media
      227
    • Reaction score
      10,036
    • Points
      1,237
  • 2

    Quantum Alchemy

    A PF Quark From Worldwide
    • Messages
      43
    • Reaction score
      9
    • Points
      6
  • 1

    PEGELLA

    A PF Atom From Toronto
    • Messages
      12
    • Reaction score
      2
    • Points
      36
  • 1

    Ali Lavasani

    A PF Quark
    • Messages
      54
    • Reaction score
      1
    • Points
      6
  • 1

    msumm21

    A PF Cell
    • Messages
      218
    • Reaction score
      16
    • Points
      128
  • 1

    DarMM

    A PF Ocean
    • Messages
      2,370
    • Reaction score
      1,407
    • Points
      343
  • 1

    sergiokapone

    A PF Cell
    • Messages
      302
    • Reaction score
      17
    • Points
      103
  • 1

    entropy1

    A PF Organism
    • Messages
      1,230
    • Reaction score
      71
    • Points
      196
  • 1

    hsdrop

    A PF Molecule 46 From edgerton, wi
    • Messages
      324
    • Reaction score
      115
    • Points
      87
  • 1

    Nickyv2423

    A PF Electron
    • Messages
      46
    • Reaction score
      3
    • Points
      11
  • 1

    LarryS

    Larry Seabrook From Southern California
    • Messages
      349
    • Reaction score
      33
    • Points
      156
  • Back
    Top