Why media is not a resource for Biology

In summary, there is a link to a daily comic page called Nonsequitur and the speaker suggests checking out the comic from Wed Oct 3, 2007. The speaker also mentions that many posts in the Biology section make claims based on articles from newspapers, but this does not necessarily make it scientific. They also mention that Wikipedia sometimes has similar issues due to spammers or individuals sharing their own opinions that may not align with scientific research. Additionally, the speaker brings up the issue of the "fair and balanced" concept, where ridiculous claims may receive equal attention to solid scientific evidence, making it difficult for the average person to differentiate between the two.
  • #1
jim mcnamara
Mentor
4,770
3,817
This is a link to a comic page that changes daily. You want to look at the one for Wed Oct 3, 2007, which is when I'm posting this.
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/

The reason I put this up in Biology is because a lot of posts claiming something or another based on what was in the Washington Post or the Manchester Guardian routinely appear here in Biology. It ain't science solely because it's in the newpaper.

Wikipedia sometimes has a problem like this - but it's because of spammers (can't think of a better word) gunking something up. Or because of a person posting his own point of view, one not shared by any other scientific researchers.

Because of the 'fair and balanced' thing, what most researchers find ridiculous
will get equal time with solid science. Joe TV watcher cannot tell the difference.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
Biology news on Phys.org

Related to Why media is not a resource for Biology

1. Why is media not considered a resource for Biology?

Media, such as television, movies, and social media, often present information in an entertaining or sensationalized way, rather than in a scientifically accurate manner. As a result, they may oversimplify complex biological concepts or present them in a misleading manner, which can lead to misconceptions and misunderstandings.

2. Can media be a reliable source of information for Biology?

While there may be some instances where media can provide accurate and reliable information about biology, it is generally not considered a reliable source. This is because media often lacks proper scientific rigor and may prioritize entertainment over accuracy.

3. How can media impact our understanding of Biology?

Media can greatly influence our understanding of biology by shaping our perceptions and beliefs about certain topics. It can also perpetuate stereotypes and misinformation, which can have significant consequences on our understanding and acceptance of scientific concepts.

4. Are there any benefits to using media as a resource for Biology?

While media may not be the best resource for accurate and in-depth scientific information, it can still provide a starting point for learning about biology. It can also serve as a way to engage and spark interest in the subject, especially for younger audiences.

5. How can we ensure that media is used appropriately in the study of Biology?

To ensure that media is used appropriately in the study of biology, it is important to critically evaluate the sources and information presented. This includes fact-checking and seeking out multiple sources to verify information. It is also important to seek out reputable and scientifically accurate sources for information on biology.

Similar threads

Is asteroid mining the key to solving world economic problems?
    • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top